User talk:SH84

Good work!

I am currently watching you protect Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince with your life. You are seriously fast! Thanks for your help and contributions! DangerousNerd talk 20:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. While you didn't vandalize the page, make sure that when you revert you revert to a non-vandalized version. The version you reverted to was vandalized (hence my confusion). Natalie 20:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem.SH84 20:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Denmark

"At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Denmark, did not appear to be constructive"

No, it was a private joke. It was up for long enough to serve its purpose. No more edits, promise! Good work catching it though :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.118.184.118 (talk) 09:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tag

Hi there. this speedy tag wasn't really the right one to apply, as the article did make claims of importance - "first company to provide 100% waterproof lightweight nylon rainwear", "internationally famous" and so on. Remember that to avoid a speedy, an article doesn't have to give cast-iron proof that the subject passes notability standards, just provide some hint that it might be worth including. I agree that the article was pretty rubbish as it stood, and had you tagged it as spam or a copyvio (it's from here I don't think anyone would have complained; as it happens though it's quite a notable brand of outdoor clothing which we probably should have an article on, so I've replaced the text with a short stub. Regards, Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 02:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, SH84! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]