User talk:SFnativeAKM

Welcome!

Hello, SFnativeAKM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Looking forward to the Edit-a-Thon! Ahalenia (talk) 16:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi SFnativeAKM! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:20, Thursday, April 22, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi SFnativeAKM! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:27, Thursday, April 22, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

COI notice

Hello, SFnativeAKM. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I am not being paid for this work. This is part of a volunteer Wikipedia edit-a-thon. All participants of the edit-a-thon receive the same list of artist names to work on. I am working from a list that everyone has. SFnativeAKM (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marlana Thompson (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EchidnaLives was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only 1 source appears to be good, NCPR. The others appear to be non-independent, and can't contribute towards notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marlana Thompson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 00:57, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SFnativeAKM! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! echidnaLives - talk - edits 00:57, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vicki Lee Soboleff (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In response to Bkissin's comment on there being a "good case", here's what WP:PERSON / WP:NARTIST say(s): People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. [...] [M]eeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included. [...] 4. The person's work (or works) has: [...] (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. We have evidence that two major museums each have a single mask made by VLS. But this strikes me as very weak evidence for notability. What has been written about her other work (basketry, dance, etc) in reliable sources?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vicki Lee Soboleff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 01:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

This is complete BS. I'll try to help you establish nobility, since they obviously are notable. Carolina-parakeet-42 (talk) 04:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Carolina-parakeet-42[reply]

Gracias SFnativeAKM (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marlana Thompson has been accepted

Marlana Thompson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 18:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So has Vicki Lee Soboleff. If these get marked for deletion, please feel free to let us know at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red. --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, thank you!! I really appreciate the help. SFnativeAKM (talk) 18:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should mention that you have had the very worst 'welcome to wikipedia' experience I've seen in a while; two very good articles declined at AfC, and a bogus COI notice. It shouldn't happen, but it does. I have taken a couple of the editors involved to task, elsewhere. WP needs editors like you, working on the sorts of articles you've started with. Illegitimi non carborundum. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to echo what Carolina-parakeet-42 and Tagishsimon said, sorry that this happened. If I can help you, I write a lot of articles on Native women and many of those have been artists, please feel free to jump on my talk page or ping me. I may not be able to help, but I have networks of people who probably can. SusunW (talk) 22:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help and for working on these articles. It does make me hesitant about starting new articles. I posted something about this on Facebook, and women responded that they have had horrible experiences on Wikipedia. SFnativeAKM (talk) 03:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best advice I can give you is if you enjoy it, keep editing. Find a network of people to collaborate with and learn from. It isn't an easy platform, but there are corners of it like Women in Red and some of the other projects that are very supportive and will help you learn the ropes. My first 6 months on here were awful, but I luckily found some good mentors and then about a year later Women in Red came along. Been editing about 9 years now, and for the most part I am able to avoid the drama pretty easily. SusunW (talk) 04:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]