Jump to content

User talk:SENSEISEAGULL

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removal of warnings

[edit]

Hi SENSEISEAGULL, while it is fine for you to blank/remove messages from your talk page, doing so means you have read an understood them and the expectation is you will not repeat the same behaviour. You have now received four warnings about your editing. Failure to heed those may result in you being blocked, whether they are still present here or in the history. 22:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC) S0091 (talk) 22:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I totally understand. I didn't realise it was such a serious issue. I won't do it anymore! SENSEISEAGULL (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 22:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091: I think this could be an edit made while logged out: diff. --Melbguy05 (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at West Mesa murders. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Melbguy05 (talk) 10:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Disappearance of Laureen Rahn. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Melbguy05 (talk)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:0HH0LYN1GHT per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/0HH0LYN1GHT. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 19:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Royal Russell Long (June 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, SENSEISEAGULL! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capital-city murders (July 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. SportingFlyer T·C 10:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]