Jump to content

User talk:SANTABABES

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, SANTABABES, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk) 12:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Masik Pass Ski Resort

[edit]

Hello SANTABABES,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Masik Pass Ski Resort for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Azərbaycan marşı has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Proposed deletion of Anthem of the People's Republic of Donetsk

[edit]

The article Anthem of the People's Republic of Donetsk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

ZERO SOURCES

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Львівське (говорити) 21:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anthem of the People's Republic of Donetsk for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthem of the People's Republic of Donetsk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthem of the People's Republic of Donetsk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Львівське (говорити) 16:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:SANTABABES/sandbox (May 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
LukeSurl t c 09:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:53, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SANTABABES/sandbox

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:SANTABABES/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://latinamericanhistory.about.com/od/presidentsofsouthamerica/p/09HChavez.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:10, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of State Emblem of the Russian SSR

[edit]

Hello SANTABABES,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged State Emblem of the Russian SSR for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Polyglot (talk) 10:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Uploading obvious copyright violations. When you were recently blocked on commons for the same thing, that was not an indication to start the same behaviour here. Images from websites, or from TV programs, are not yours and CANNOT be uploaded here with a claim that they are under a free licence.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Peripitus (Talk) 11:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SANTABABES (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you block me, you have to block User:Ruigeroeland too! He has been vandalizing even more! SANTABABES (talk) 11:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked because of what you did. Do not make further unfounded allegations otherwise your ability to edit this page will be revoked. MER-C 11:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What did I do? Since when am I vandalizing? Ruigeroeland (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock Today!

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SANTABABES (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ill Give Donations To Wikimedia Projects SANTABABES (talk) 8:40 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

We don't respond well to attempted bribery. Donate or don't donate, it's up to you - but any donations you choose to make will have no bearing whatsoever on your block. This is your second unblock request which completely fails to address your block - if your next appeal fails to abide by the appeals guildelines, you can expect to lose your talkpage access as well. Yunshui 雲水 07:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Unblock Me!

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SANTABABES (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Am So Sorry Sir I Now Not Uploaded Non-Free Or Copyright Violence

Decline reason:

You have now so proved beyond any doubt that you don't get copyright, that not only am I declining this request, I'm revoking your talk page access so you and we won't waste each other's time any more. Good-bye. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're not blocked for uploading violence! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 16:14, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SANTABABES&oldid=612783309"