User talk:SANKURDAS

Welcome!

Hello, SANKURDAS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sridevi. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i gave all the proofs according to my edit then why are you re-editing ?

Read the article at first .

It's my humble request to you . SANKURDAS (talk) 20:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? I just approved your recent addition to Sridevi article, which was pending and put up a welcome message here especially thanking you for that edit on Sridevi article and this is how you react? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to say like that , by the way thanks a lot for your cordial cooperation.

I need more help about this page because there are a lot of mistakes.

And there in an another edit which was re-edited by you previously... sir , please read the attached link carefully there it's specified that FOR SHEER MOURNERS IT HAD ATTRACTED MOST NUMBER OF PEOPLE , as that information lies there in that source i didn't attach another one

Please read it carefully SANKURDAS (talk) 20:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir ,@Shshshsh is harrassing me a lot . Why don't you protest about it as a wikipedian ? He is not approving what you already approved about my addition.

Please help me sir 🙏. SANKURDAS (talk) 10:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sridevi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I provided the source from NEWS-18 which is a branch of the national organisation called CNN-IBN. Check it out there . SANKURDAS (talk) 10:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #77424

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SANKURDAS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to reply on a talk page's post SANKURDAS (talk) 13:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll be able to do that if you get unblocked; I recommend reading the guide to appealing blocks and crafting a suitable unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.