User talk:SANCAN112

October 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Legendary Dudas. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:39, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Legendary Dudas.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:54, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Disney Channel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Amaury (talk | contribs) 00:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 00:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 00:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:167.0.207.29, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Citytv Bogotá. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Jim1138 (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Disney Channel series. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amaury (talk | contribs) 20:01, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at List of Disney Channel series. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Meters (talk) 20:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SANCAN112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me, It is not fair to block me for what I did, I have been blocked many times, I want a last chance, I will not do it again, I will not, I will not re-edit those articles that I entered until further notice, But please unlock me, I have been through this many times, I want to give me one last chance, and I beg my sincere apologies to the other users who attacked and verbally attacked, it was not my intention, but they have me Fed up of undoing my edits without any justification, I want them to unlock my account

Decline reason:

Since you've done this on at least two accounts now, I think you've had plenty of chances. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.