User talk:SAM1212wil

SAM1212wil, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SAM1212wil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Judy Mikovits, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I expressed some truthful information that you refused to allow; seems like you are against Judy anyways. You should not be bias in this Wikipedia site. actually it was more facts that you cheat wikipedia out of. sounds like a personal thing that you refuse to allow anyone to edit the person b/c you own it. it is wikipedia's loss. ((Sam1212wil)) (SAM1212wil (talk) 20:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Please see my explanation in the edit summary, and at WP:COPYVIOEL. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I made an addition then it must have been important. Seems like you are the ONE standing in the way of Wikipedia ever being anything great! actually it was more facts that you cheat wikipedia out of. sounds like a personal thing that you refuse to allow anyone to edit the person b/c you own it. it is wikipedia's loss. (SAM1212wil)(SAM1212wil (talk) 20:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

Film articles

You might benefit from reading the guidelines at MOS:FILM. Please also take a look at WP:SIMPLE which emphasizes the importance of providing an edit summary to explain your changes.

Plot sections in film articles do not normally contain references or external links such as the links you added to HBO Max in the Wonder Woman 1984 article. If one of your changes is reverted, it is a good idea to look at the article History to see if other editors wrote an edit summary explaining why they reverted your change.

The plot changes you made might be acceptable, but please don't add links to the plot section (or if you have some really good reason for it then explain with an edit summary). -- 109.79.180.72 (talk) 16:03, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

actually it was more facts that you cheat wikipedia out of. It was in the description area of EXPLAINING WHY the woman who wished never knew she had super powers, she thought that she was a strong assertive woman, but later went into detail about how she never knew about the SUPER POWERS!!! I watched the movie and saw that the plot never elaborated on the facts or details that was important. sounds like a personal thing that you refuse to allow anyone to edit the person b/c you own it. it is wikipedia's loss. (SAM1212wil) (SAM1212wil (talk) 20:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi. You need to read WP:RS and WP:ELNO and stop adding random links. You're adding bare URLs, mangled citations, and such. Sometimes you've redundantly added a bare url directly into prose and then cited it with itself. You need to go back and find the citations that can be kept and properly format them with Template:cite web type of metadata, aside from the ones that were so poor that they were already reverted.

And I see above that you are on a trip of aimlessly and baselessly insulting Wikipedians for their constructive advice, even for automated templates. That needs to end. WP:NPA WP:ASPERSIONS. — Smuckola (talk) 22:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judy Norton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Off Season. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]