User talk:S. Ugarte

Touro articlle

Hi S. Ugarte. I am not sure if you refer to my eidts, or not. While respect yphave left a message on the Touro Synagogue discussion page. best, CApitol3 17:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Korten Discussion page

Hello. I'm not sure if you think I am making wiki-rules up to suit my POV, but strongly recommend you do a little research on Talk Page Guidelines, Biographies of Living Persons, NPOV, etc. You might want to edit your comments before I reply, that way you will know whether

policies that apply to articles apply also (if not to the same extent) to talk pages, including Wikipedia's verification, neutral point of view and no original research policies

, or not. Best WishesCronos1 (talk) 23:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view..." (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV) Yep. Looks like I was right and you were wrong. Sorry, buddy. S. Ugarte (talk) 21:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, no, you aren't right. What you see quoted above in my first post is wiki policy.Cronos1 (talk) 21:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Article talk pages should not be used by editors as a platform for their personal views, nor for casual conversation. Article talk pages are only to be used for discussing improvements to their associated pages."(http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_pages) "The policies that apply to articles apply also (if not to the same extent) to talk pages, including Wikipedia's verification, neutral point of view and no original research policies."(http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines)"Non-article space

Talk pages are used to make decisions about article contents. Contentious material that is unsourced or poorly sourced and not related or useful to making article content choices should be deleted, and even permanently removed ("oversighted") if especially problematic (telephone number, libel, etc). New material should generally be discussed in order to arrive at a consensus concerning relevance, availability of sources, and reliability of sources. Repeated questionable claims with biographies of living persons issues not based on new evidence can generally be immediately deleted with a reference to where in the archive the prior consensus was reached." (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons) This isn't about anyone being right/wrong, its about being good wiki editors, please edit your comments on Kortens discussion page to comply with wikipedia rules.Cronos1 (talk) 22:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's a reach, and I think you know it. But if you'd like to delete anything I wrote on the Talk page, feel free. You certainly seem more interested in debating the rules than improving the Korten article, but this debate isn't one I'm interested in. S. Ugarte (talk) 23:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to think of it as a reach if you wish, if you don't clean up your comments on the Korten Talk page, I will be reporting to the biographies of living persons noticeboard.Cronos1 (talk) 23:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just delete the parts that bother you instead of wasting everyone's time? Like I said, I don't mind at all. I don't mind if you want to report me to whomever you wish, either, but it seems like a silly thing to do. S. Ugarte (talk) 02:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Findory

The article Findory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:42, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]