Jump to content

User talk:S! Doke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

S! Doke, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi S! Doke! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
That's a very good job on your fight against vandalism. Thank you for joining us in fighting against vandalism! Good luck :) ----Rdp060707|talk 08:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage Boot Camp revert

[edit]

I recently made minor edits on the below sentences, which to me did not appear to be complete sentences:

On January 8, 2020, it was announced that the sixteenth season of the series (the eleventh season of Marriage Boot Camp: Reality Stars Hip Hop Edition) which premiered on February 6, 2020.[8] It was announced that What?? What was announced? The sentence as written doesn't say, so I rewrote it. Ditto for "On May 20, 2020, it was announced that the seventeenth season of the series (the twelfth season of Marriage Boot Camp: Reality Stars Hip Hop Edition) which premiered on July 2, 2020.[9]" Maybe I'm stupid but it didn't make sense to me. Perhaps I should have changed WHICH premiered to would premiere, instead, but I wasn't trying to be disruptive, I swear. I've never even got a message about such a thing before (congrats you took my disruptive virginity, I guess), that is never my intention here.2600:1702:2A40:3E40:89E2:5E1A:3B18:CF1C (talk) 10:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S! Doke (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Is there anything wrong with my edit that you have blocked me, this is my first account but I have been blocked for multiple accounts. I do not use any other account. Thank You S! Doke (talk) 13:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, supported with technical evidence, so sockpuppetry is not in doubt. If you are not a sock, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why technical evidence would indicate otherwise. 331dot (talk) 17:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.