User talk:Ryulong/Archive 97

Archive 90

←

Archive 95

Archive 96

Archive 97

Archive 98

Archive 99

Archive 100

Redirect

You don't need to redirect Just Dance 2015 to something else. It's become true. See for yourself. Kittygirl7878 (talk) 23:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Article has no sources. The game was just announced. You formatted it terribly. Wait for people with more experience on Wikipedia to make it when it actually passes WP:N.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:18, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

I don't know how to put sources. Kittygirl7878 (talk) 23:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Then don't make the article and wait for someone else. It's only been like an hour since it was announced so you can wait.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Ryulong, if you still remember, you can tell me the name of article. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

It's been taken care of.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Talk page was still salted, had to get it removed. Probably, many are going to edit this article for a while. Hopefully, protection is on its way. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

ANI

Wikipedia says I'm SUPOSSED to notify when I mention you.Rayayala17 (talk) 22:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC).

If I'm the one who started the thread you don't have to notify me that you've responded in the thread I made about you.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

J-Stars Victory VS article

About J-Stars Victory VS' article, if by "We do not need it separate to present the information twice." you mean the voice actors are listed twice, I actually removed the voice actors from the character list. But if by that you meant the characters were listed twice, then I don't see the problem. And as I said before, it looks a lot better with the voice actors on a separate section. Juandmarco (talk) 20:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Voice actors listed twice on a handful of characters is nothing like listing all of the characters, again, just to have the voice actors separate.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Coming Back for the Gold

Can you link me to some sources verifying your claim? Every official source I checked goes against what you're saying. It doesn't matter if it doesn't make sense, it matters what the sources are saying. You yourself said we go off of reliable sources, and I have checked Cartoon Network, DirectTV, Comcast, and Time Warner Cable.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 01:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Just google the alternate title. It's coming up in other sources. And use common sense. What does the episode with those ice dinosaurs have to do with gold?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

I googled it, and only got one source which isn't even reliable. Frankly, common sense has nothing to do with it. It's well established already that what's published in reliable sources, including the official site of the channel hosting it, goes. Even if they get it wrong. I haven't seen a single reliable source that says it's the title you claim. Nothing against you, just going off what I'm seeing. I propose, since these sources are claiming this is the title, that we leave it as "Coming Back for the Gold", until it official airs, which is this Saturday in the UK, where we can then make the correct changes to it.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 13:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Well in this case the sources seem to be incorrect. So I'm invoking WP:IAR. A single episode title isn't worth all the hassle.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

I can't accept that. I can easily counter that with WP:IAR as well. ;-)—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 14:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

No, in this case you are sticking to the rules by demanding that the sources (which are apparently inaccurate) are infallible.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 14:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

What I don't get, is what makes you think the sources are wrong, aside from the fact that they may be wrong. I'm finding it a bit hard to believe that these many sources, including the official site, get it wrong.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 00:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Because there is no reason that the ice fossil Pokémon episode would have "gold" in the title. End of conversation.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Fine. I'll leave it for now. But I get to trout you if it turns out to be wrong.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 11:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Remind me to trust your sense more often. :p—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 16:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

It was probably some mix up with that golden magikarp episode from a couple of weeks ago.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Probably on Pokemon's end because that was distributed to every TV provider I know, and to cartoon network. Regardless, the issue is now resolved. :-)—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 18:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

‎2602:306:384b:a160:80ad:cea8:66f4:45c9

Would you mind having a look at their edits to the Pokemon Movies?—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 18:52, 27 June 2014 (UTC)