User talk:Ryu Ematsu/Archive Two

My "terrible edits and spellings"

You might want to take a look at the history page before you type up edit summaries like those. I did not make those edits, nor did I spell anything on List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball. I reverted the page to remove some redundant trivia of a game per WP:TRIVIA. -- bulletproof ^3:16 17:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. No worries. -- bulletproof ^3:16 17:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Android/Artificial Human

I changed 18 but you'll have to take 17 tp WP:RM. Either that or ask a mod for help. Deskana is usually willing to help, but the last name debate he got involved in turned into a hellish quagmire, and I don't really want to suck the poor guy into another one (oddly that one was caused by the same editor as this current one). I also left a note on Link's talk page about his unfounded bad faith accusations. Let me just caution you not to fall into a similar pattern. These disagreements can feed off each other and go into a rut real fast. I'm not going to get too involved with this today (this is constantly happening and it gets tiring), but I'll look in tomorrow or monday. So let me know if I can do anything else.Onikage725 12:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANVAS

I noticed that you were attempting to generate input into the discussion, although it seems that you were just trying to force a consensus by getting everyone to come to the discussion and force a consensus. - A Link to the Past (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Link to the Past

He has issues with WP:DBZ I'll give you that. I threatened him with a ban proposal though that's really for obvious vandals. He is pushing it, and many Wikipedians disaprove of his continuous irritating behaviour. How does a WP:RFC or WP:LTA sound? Lord Sesshomaru 17:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It bothers me to be hearing you two talk like this. Link needs to be less annoying with his concerns, but he has not violated any policy, and has many valid concerns. -- Ned Scott 04:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you know what I'm referring to:

What in the world are you doing? - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: #17

Both #17 & #18 are listed to be moved/renamed at WP:RM. Once that is taken care of, then we might update those articles in peace. Lord Sesshomaru 17:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The accuracy claims are somewhere in there, check the part where it says loan words and/or translation(s) from Japanese. WP:ANIME has some of those details also, I presume. When I finish what I'm doing now I'll help you out Ryu. Lord Sesshomaru 17:59, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tenkaichi 3

Mid Goku is still technically a new character to the Budokai Tenkaichi series, and thus should be labelled as such. Even though the Tenkaichi article lists characters as new (a bad idea on my part) despite the fact there's nothing they can be new to, with the Tenkaichi 2 and 3 articles, new characters are ones not present in their imidiate predecessor. I'm going to go back and fix up the Tenkaichi article, as well as readd Mid Goku to the new section. If you wish, you may start a discussionon the matter on BT3's talk page. I hope I didn't cause any kind of confusion, frustration, or the like. // DecaimientoPoético 19:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

4th Hokage/Naruto

I noticed your recent disagreement over this matter. I just want to say that while I agree as a fan that the evidence is compelling, that isn't enough for inclusion here. Maybe something like "it is implied that the 4th may have been Naruto's father." But if you look at the chapter in question, they never outright say it. Therefore neither can we. Extrapolating from an insinuation is original research. Onikage725 01:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hildegarn, and total of characters.

Hey I was just wondering, you know in the Japenese website of DBZ BT3. How come it only has the final form of Hildegarn. If only his final form is going to be this game, I be so pissed because I want to play as his base form too. That will also make the game a lot less interesting for many fans hoping for cool characters. If his base form is in there, be sure to tell me because I be so happy. Also just how many characters are there left because 20 doesn't seem to be enough for the game since they could changed this info (hopefully) to a much higher number. Also can you tell me if Super Trunks, Andriod 14 and 15, Bio-Broly, General Rildo, General Blue and Elis Shenron are going to be in this game? Anyway have a good day. Johnny542 19:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay thanks for the info but you know over time dreams can come true and hopefully this one will or I be pissed off. But wait why do you think that Hildegarn' first form and Ice Shenron could not be in this game? I am confused about this. Johnny542 12:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well... It still doesn't seem right for Eis Shenron to shoot fireballs from him, that would be stupid and anyway is that actually the offical website of the game or just the offical Japanese website? Anyway I am pretty sure they just going to come out of nowhere and put Hildegarn's first form in... hopefully. Oh yean and I checked the website and not all the trasnformations are in order of their base states like Super Vegeta is in a different section from Vegeta and Super Saiyan Vegeta. Johnny542 21:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I meant that not all the forms are in order like Super Vegeta is in a different section from Vegeta and Super Saiyan Vegeta, I know what you mean but I was talking about something else. Also would there be a Piccolo Mid? Johnny542 01:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Piccolo Mid is probably going to be Nail and Piccolo fused together or something like that. Johnny542 19:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Android names IMHO

Those titles are even worse than what I once suggested, I still think Cyborg 18 and Cyborg 17 are legitimate enough. What do you believe? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, now I don't know what the pages should really be titled at this point. Artificial Human 17 & Artificial Human 18 were too long a name; Android is popular but is incorrect, and although they were never called cyborgs, that is pretty much what they are. Why not 'try' Cyborg 17 & Cyborg 18 now and see what others think? I guess the only user who would have a quarrel with that one is A Link to the Past (talk · contribs · logs) but since WP:WPDB adheres to these main rules there's not much he can argue. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relibity

How is Game Informer Unreliable, that's like saying Nintendo Power is unreliable! Claycrow 14:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being rude, I just didn't understand. Claycrow 14:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]