Jump to content

User talk:Ryopus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my chat page.

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of countries by past and future GDP (PPP) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {| style="font-size:95%;"
  • {|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:42, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Monetary Fund, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Øystein Olsen and Thomas Jordan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forbes Global 2000

[edit]

The actual Forbes article [1] specifically stated "China (mainland and Hong Kong) adds 25 to the list this year, more than any other country, for a total of 207". That is why it is combined.

And there is another good reason why. If you look at the Forbes Global 2000 companies listed under Hong Kong [2], many of the top companies, such as China Mobile, CNOOC, China Unicom, China Railway Group, Beijing Enterprises, China Agri-Industries Holdings, China Resources Power, China Taiping, and more, are Chinese government owned companies. The filter only sorted them under Hong Kong because they were listed on Hong Kong's Hang Seng China-Affiliated Corporations Index (aka Red chip, which explains "These businesses are based in mainland China and controlled, either directly or indirectly, by the central, provincial or municipal governments of the Peoples' Republic of China but listed in Hong Kong to allow overseas investment in the companies."). Because of these blurred lines, it makes perfect sense that the Forbes article combined them.--DerechoReguerraz (talk) 21:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please respond on this talk page.--DerechoReguerraz (talk) 21:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Forbes Global 2000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eaton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World economy data

[edit]

Please, do not remove data like this. World Bank made predictions for economical output for each country ((years '14 and '15) AND this predictions are available. So, anyone can calculate output '15 using data from World Bank. The fact that it is not a single table doesn't change a thing and has nothing to do whit the article.Silwol (talk) 03:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Italian and Irish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Development Bank, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, Portuguese and Russian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Your recent edit to the page List of IMF ranked countries by past and projected GDP (nominal) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Apologies for having thanked you for your first change to the reference. In fact, when I checked through all three major edits to the data, you were still drawing on the identical sources and only changing the retrieval date. Please identify your reliable sources before making dramatic changes to IMF data.
Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About the economical data

[edit]

User:Ryopus, why are you changing economical data of nations and regions without changing any of the sources? Such things are labeled as vandalism and disruption here. Please write in your edit summaries what you're doing and add sources when you change statistical data. Otherwise we have to report it to moderators here.

Thanks in advance. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About my automated compression of the four IMF tables in three GDP articles

[edit]

As a traditional very serious BASIC programmer, with LibreOffice Calc macros I have just automatically compacted the 4 IMF tables from the April 2015 World Economic Outlook (WEO) database, after being absolutely or completely sure that ALL the previous data is kept. Please believe me that this is the case. Best regards from the Argentinian city of Bahía Blanca ("White Bay"). :-) MaxBech1975 (talk) 15:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About the separate column in four list of countries by GDP articles

[edit]

Excuse me for not having paid attention to the separate number column issue before, but now I finally see what you mean (and what you had already meant back in November 2014). Howeber, restoring that feature or characteristic will involve some more additional programming, which I will try to carry out as soon as posible. MaxBech1975 (talk) 16:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to World economy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • style="width:50%; "| '''List of Country Groups by GDP (nominal) in 2014 in Billions [[USD|US]]$]'''<ref name="autogenerated2"/>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Ryopus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ryopus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of African countries by GDP (PPP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ryopus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Florida Democratic primary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Dobson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. See [3] CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 19:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also per WP:OVERLINK, this linkage of all or most of the regions was unnecessary. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 19:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Republican Primary Results Chart

[edit]

Why aren't the other candidates not on it? I understand if you're a Trump supporter and a bit biased and pissed off at the Republicans running against him, but we should at least include how many votes and delegates they got. It makes way more sense and it is way more convenient for people to just look at that instead of having to go elsewhere for the information. Are you trying to sabotage the website? Neophyte Novice (talk) 23:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 South Carolina Democratic primary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Delaney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MIKTA for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MIKTA, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIKTA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]