User talk:Ryodox

Please don't change other peoples votes on vfd. --Phroziac (talk) 19:20, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For my first edit when I didn't know how to properly edit Wikipedia.

--Ryodox 01:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to David Duke, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 01:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was for one of my earliest edits mistaken for vandalism. The dispute has been resolved.

--Ryodox 01:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you from?

Last time I check, African-Americans were free citizens able to vote. Did you just pop out of a time machine from the 1940's in Alabama? Get a life, and stop spreading your White Power propaganda on wikipedia! 69.167.100.155 06:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This message was from one of DocFisherKing's alias IP addresses, wrongly accusing me of spreading "propaganda".

--Ryodox 01:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure it was pal. DocFisherKing

David Duke

Thanks for the note. It actually un-wikified the link. Rgds, Rich Farmbrough 09:59 31 August 2006 (GMT).

Re: Content dispute?

Yes, a content dispute. This is not a simple case of vandalism on either side, and this should go through the dispute resolution process, not to WP:AIV. Thanks for writing. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 02:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to Ryodox and DocFisherKing

To Ryodox and DocFisherKing: you both would be well served to read WP:3RR, for which you both would be blocked were your dispute to continue. Pease also read what vandalism is (and is not) and why none of us owns any page at Wikipedia, including those within our own user space. Edit wars are counter to the ideals of the encyclopedia and will be dealt with accordingly (and, reversions to an "accepted version" had better include a link to theconsensus therefor). If, after reading this, you still disagree as to the content of the article, take it to dispute resolution.. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 02:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing DocFisherKing

Re:what do u make of this

It looks like a NPOV Statement.--CableModem 21:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. DocFisherKing

Contested Prod

Well any contested prod can be taken to AfD which is what I did. Whispering^(talk/c) 21:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -Will Beback 09:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: The same goes for alternate accounts and edits made while not logged-in. -Will Beback 09:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well that warning didn't mean anything to you User:Ryodox, now did it? DocFisherKing

I warned you because you were either had violated the 3RR policy or were on the verge of doing so. [1][2][3][4][5], etc. Revert wars are a bad thing. Please do not rely on reverts to settle edit disputes. It's better to settle things and develop consensus on the talk page. Rather seeing anyone get blocked, I'd like to see us all come to an agreement about this material. -Will Beback 10:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nice try Ryodox

208.192.66.196 208.192.66.196

Record Type: IP Address

UUNET Technologies, Inc. UUNET1996B (NET-208-192-0-0-1)

208.192.0.0 - 208.255.255.255

WS/EXOP OF KEARNEY MISSOURI DBA UNITE | GREATER KANSAS CITY |

EXOP OF MISSOURI | CLAY COUNTY |UU-208-192-64-D4 (NET-208-192-64-0-1)

208.192.64.0 - 208.192.79.255

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Kearney%2C_Missouri&diff=prev&oldid=87189434

You didn't fool me! DocFisherKing

I offer peace

Anytime you would like to discuss anything with me Ryan, just leave me a message and I will be willing to respond to whatever topic you choose because I am very fond of you, however I can't stand all this racist, or "socialist", nonsense you have become involved with. It is a waste of your intellect. DocFisherKing

User page protection

There has been some vandalism of your talk page, so I've protected it from editing by new or unregistered users. You should still be able to edit it. Let me or another admin know if you'd like to have it unprotected. -Will Beback · † · 23:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cthulhupainting.jpg

Hello Ryodox, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Cthulhupainting.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Ryodox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 11:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]