User talk:Rupert Johnson

Lost the student experiment

Please do not attempt to use Wikipedia to promote a website. Thanks. Tonywalton | Talk 13:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Christophe Dugarry

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tonywalton | Talk 14:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly supply citations from reliable sources that he was "considered a god" and that this picture (which I note you appear to have created yourself with Photoshop) was ever ~~published~~ verifiably accepted by anyone but yourself as a likeness of him. Thank you. Tonywalton | Talk 14:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but a statement on a Wikipedia talk page doesn't count as a reliable source. And there is still no evidence that your picture was ever used or accepted as a likeness of Dugarry by anyone except yourself. It would also be good if you could sign your edit on talk pages by placing ~~~~ at the end. Thanks. Tonywalton | Talk 14:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please go and look at what reliable sources, verifiability and original research are. An unattributed statement on a chatroom counts as a reliable source as much as something made up in school does. To put it another way, If I were to get a mate of mine to say on a chatroom that Dugarry is an arse, I doubt whether you would accept this as proof that Image:Male_human_buttocks.jpg would be appropriate on the page. Please let this drop now, Rupert. Tonywalton | Talk 10:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dugarry.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dugarry.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]