User talk:Rune370

Proposed deletion of playback (technique)

The article playback (technique) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable enough for a stand alone article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Rune370, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rune370! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Modanung

For your information: Modanung was blocked indefinitely at the german Wikipedia for his abusive behavior in trying to force his self-created image into the Chaosmagie article because of being a Single-Purpose Account and violating the No Original Research rule. I have no idea how the appropriate procedure here would work, but if you need any assistance get back to me. —viciarg⁴¹⁴ 15:06, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring case opened against User:Modanung

Hiya. You might be interested in lending your voice on the edit warring case I opened against the aforementioned user. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Modanung_reported_by_User:Tyw7_(Result:_) --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 12:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tyw7, I'd be happy to lend my support. Where would you like me to leave the comment? On the page you linked to, or on the talk page for the German article? Or somewhere else? Rune370 (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At the time of the comment, the page linked to. But apparently Mo had dug himself into a hole and is now permanently banned with talk page privileges revoked. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 18:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've just seen that he's been banned. Thanks for your support, and your help reverting the disruptive edits, I appreciate it. Rune370 (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Chaos magic into Gnosis (chaos magic). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Rune370. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:09, 20 June 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Ways to improve Servitor (chaos magic)

Hi, I'm Xevus11. Rune370, thanks for creating Servitor (chaos magic)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please avoid using citations/footnotes from other wikipedia pages, wikipedia is not considered a reliable source for other wikipedia pages. Additionally, please see how other article's structure their reference lists, such as on George Washington. Listing a footnotes and sources section separately is highly unusual.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Xevus11 (talk) 22:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, it looks like I was just confused by the citation layout. The article looks great now, happy editing!Xevus11 (talk) 23:02, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for documenting chaos magick!

	here is a picture of watermelon snow
	see title! i've needed documentation on wikipedia of burroughs' playback technique and synchromysticism for a while, thank you very much TreeLethargy (talk) 16:42, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rune370. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Synchromysticism

Hi,

I'm really happy to see with your changes the page Synchromysticism was finally published... even if you didn't mention the contributions I made :-/

Perhaps one good turn deserves another? Could you help me with a pet project I'm volunteering for? We need some nuetral editing on artist page Jim Ricks. Much appreciated!

Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 18:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dave Lee (chaos magician)

The article Dave Lee (chaos magician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person doesn't meet our notability guidelines, and no secondary sources can be found. All existing sources are non reliable (chat logs, etc)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]