User talk:Rule 56
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Summary judgment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judges (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Hyphens
[edit]Please read the articles you are editing! A single malt whisky is a whisky from one distillery. A single-malt whisky would be a whisky made from one type of malt. -- Ian Dalziel (talk) 01:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ian, I'd recommend that you do likewise. The article says that a single-malt whisky "is whisky from a single distillery made from a mash that uses only one particular malted grain." So it comes from one distillery and uses one grain. In this context, "single malt" describes the type of whisky. When two words combine to describe another, they are a phrasal adjective. And phrasal adjectives get hyphenated: single-malt whisky. Really, it's simple grammar. Cheers.
- Nope. Single distillery, as you say. The adjectives are separate. The phrase could be expanded as "single-distillery pure-malt whisky". "Single-cask" is a phrasal adjective, "single malt" is a pair of discrete adjectives both applied to "whisky". Really, it's simple grammar. Cheers. -- Ian Dalziel (talk) 02:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- I don't say: the article you accused me of not reading says. But the "single" in "single malt" only refers incidentally to the fact that it comes from a single distiller. The primary reference is to the fact that it only derives from a single malted grain. Two adjectives working together to describe one word: single-malt Scotch. But don't take my word for it. The best-edited periodical on the planet also refers to it as "single-malt" Scotch: http://www.economist.com/node/16381365. Now go have one on me. The cheque, as they might say in Bingley, is in the mail. Cheers.Rule 56 (talk) 03:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- That is precisely the point - that is NOT the primary reference. "Malt" means that it comes only from malted barley (but does not restrict the type of malted barley - it could even contain pale malt and crystal malt and still be pue malt). It may be more clear if you look at grain whisky. That can contain a mixture of grains and usually does. Cameron Brig is a single grain whisky, but emphatically not a single-grain whisky. I'm not sure what your source is for saying that the Economist is the best-edited periodical on the planet, but if it uses "single-malt" it is just plain wrong. -- Ian Dalziel (talk) 10:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- I don't say: the article you accused me of not reading says. But the "single" in "single malt" only refers incidentally to the fact that it comes from a single distiller. The primary reference is to the fact that it only derives from a single malted grain. Two adjectives working together to describe one word: single-malt Scotch. But don't take my word for it. The best-edited periodical on the planet also refers to it as "single-malt" Scotch: http://www.economist.com/node/16381365. Now go have one on me. The cheque, as they might say in Bingley, is in the mail. Cheers.Rule 56 (talk) 03:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Nope. Single distillery, as you say. The adjectives are separate. The phrase could be expanded as "single-distillery pure-malt whisky". "Single-cask" is a phrasal adjective, "single malt" is a pair of discrete adjectives both applied to "whisky". Really, it's simple grammar. Cheers. -- Ian Dalziel (talk) 02:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Bhi Bhiman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sri Lankan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Random acts of baking
[edit]
|
A cupcake for you! That was a great copy edit you did on Reinhard Heydrich. Cheers, Dianna (talk) 00:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC) |
- Very kind. Thank you.Rule 56 (talk) 00:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with Diannaa, good job on the ce. If you enjoy doing it and have the time there are others that need copy edit and cite clean up work, such as, the articles: Joachim von Ribbentrop, Nazi Party and Nazism. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 15:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- And thank you. That's very kind of you to say. Rule 56 (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with Diannaa, good job on the ce. If you enjoy doing it and have the time there are others that need copy edit and cite clean up work, such as, the articles: Joachim von Ribbentrop, Nazi Party and Nazism. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 15:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Very nice job at Joachim von Ribbentrop. File:Thumbsup emote.gif -- Ϫ 00:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Many thanks. Rule 56 (talk) 02:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Rule 56. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Rule 56. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)