User talk:Rufe

Welcome!

Hello, Rufe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ^Blank ^Verse 12:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kyoko Takezawa

You have recently re-created the article Kyoko Takezawa, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Irongargoyle 16:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have done a little more investigation and it appears she may be notable. Please include this information on the page however. As of now there is no assertion of importance in the article, and this is a criteria for speedy deletion. Best, Irongargoyle 16:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, so if I disagree about the deletion of this article, should I edit the article to include her importance or should I ask for it to be reviewed first? Takezawa's less famous than, for example, Perlman but is a recording artist with major lables such as RCA and BMG. Should this be part of the article?

Would you help to review a Japanese translation made by Wikipedians?

There's been a recent discussion at the talk page of the article for the Internet meme All your base are belong to us. The topic was made famous for the gruesome Engrish translations in the original video game, and the article provided a somewhat more accurate translation along the original text.

The discussion could benefit from a review of the accuracy of these translations as it appeared in this recent version, by someone with fluency in Japanese and experience dealing with editor-made translations at Wikipedia. Thanks for your time. Diego (talk) 11:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aikido Edits

For Aikido Styles I think it is best if there is some link (either the organization or the founder) to include in the list. I agree with all your additions and I think the idea by having a link to a real article (ie. not redlink) is that it sets the bar to all the other non-notable organizations that get added. I don't want to revert your edits but I would hope we can get at least a stub for those organizations.Peter Rehse (talk) 03:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the minimum criteria is that there is some sort of article referencing the style. There is fact if memory serves me articles to Homma that might have been deleted. It the style is non-notable the theory is that the article wont survive. Can you let me know what style is dubious and I can take a look.Peter Rehse (talk) 03:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At one point there was just such a list and in the end the article "Aikido Styles" was developed out of that. Going back to a List will lead to as before all sorts of minor styles/organizations demanding space. Probably best not to go there.Peter Rehse (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gaku Homma

On the talk page you can see the results of the old deletion debate which resulted in the eventual deletion. It looks to me as if a little bit more information had been provided that it would have survived. I suggest you use Tetsuro Nariyama as a template for the minimum. I already did some categorization.Peter Rehse (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaku Homma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gaku Homma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shriram (talk) 04:17, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gaku Homma

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Gaku Homma. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaku Homma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gaku Homma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 05:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the comments at User talk:Bgwhite Peter Rehse (talk) 06:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have got it covered but to make sure we really need something more with respect to references - not local and not Aikido Journal. Great if you could find something.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:39, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aikido concepts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Uke

Seigo Yamaguchi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Gleason

Yoshinkan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shite

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Morihiro Saito

Do you have any comments about what is said at the bottom of the talk page (Talk:Morihiro Saito).Peter Rehse (talk) 09:13, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seigo Yamaguchi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Seigo Yamaguchi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for translation: List of sources for an article

Dear Rufe,

On the Reference desk someone recommended using the list of translators in response to a request. Are you willing to translate portions of or all of the list of references on this page? es:Wikipedia discusión:Consultas de borrado/Liceo Mexicano Japonés? It is for an AFD on the Spanish Wikipedia. This is so Spanish-speaking editors can understand what Japanese references exist about the subject. You are welcome to translate the references into English.

Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Fritz Kreisler Competition

The article International Fritz Kreisler Competition has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article had no sources; I added one, but most of the information is unreferenced, including the list of winners. This is one of many (~23) articles for violin competitions that is virtually unsourced. They are also mostly older articles, dating from the early days of Wikipedia, before sourcing was as strongly enforced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LaMona (talk) 15:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of International Fritz Kreisler Competition for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Fritz Kreisler Competition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Fritz Kreisler Competition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LaMona (talk) 19:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of violinist/composers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of violinist/composers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of violinist/composers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]