User talk:RubenWan

Hi Ruben! I see you've started on Star Wars Combine. Please remember to cite the source of all your information, and to write in a neutral tone (WP:V, WP:NPOV). Some of the statements you made read like opinion, or original research. If I get time, I'll add more from the PC Gamer writeup. Marasmusine (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ruben, thanks for contacting me. I have restored the article to your userspace at User:RubenWan/Star Wars Combine. After you have added the new material and citations, you might like to ask at the videogames project for people to check it over. Then contact me again and I'll move it back to mainspace. Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 10:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Submitted your draft to Star Wars Combine

Hi Ruben,

I see you've done some great work on the article. I took some interest, helped clean things up, added images, and submitted it into the "mainspace" of Wikipedia. It's more than good enough now, and someone should approve it soon. I also had to replace your image with a non-free image, as developers must release their images to Wikipedia official to be on Wikimedia Commons. No worries though, you should now be good to go once it's approved. --Teancum (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate that. I apologise for the image, I asked permission by the SWC Art Team and they said it was ok for them, then I got lost in all the questions on different copyrights. --RubenWan (talk) 02:17, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just for reference, the submitted page is here: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Star_Wars_Combine --RubenWan (talk) 07:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Star Wars Combine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nimuaq (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fortune plango vulnera

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fortune plango vulnera, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 19:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fortune plango vulnera

Hi, I realize you created this page in good-faith. However, you should know that Wikipedia is not a lyrical database. In other words, a page with lyrical content by itself is generally not acceptable. Moreover, lyrics are often copyrighted, in which case we have to only use small excerpts, but I'm unsure if that is the case with this number. These days there's so many new pages constantly being created, only the very recently created ones get patrolled. This may be why the criteria for speedy deletion has become more strict. If you want to indicate the article is still being expanded, you can use the {{new page}} template. The easier route is to just create a draft, and once complete, move the page to mainspace. If you would like, I can restore the deleted content from Fortune plango vulnera to Draft:Fortune plango vulnera where you can work on it further. Best — MusikAnimal ^talk 22:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]