User talk:Rtheri3/AdamRapp Sandbox

Ladies, this looks excellent--I think you have done a spectacular job refocusing the article to Rapp's theatre work. Good information and ideas here. We may do a bit more with content, but I think in terms of all that, you are mostly good to go. Congratulations!!!! --Drdvader21 (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Hi Chelsey, Rachel, and Megan: This is shaping up to really look like a great Wikipedia article. Nice work on the formatting!! (I'll leave the comments on the actual content to Leigh ;) --Rburdette (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You do need to fill out the references, adding the bibliographic information, such as author name, url, title of the article or book cited, date and publisher name. You also need to expand the introduction section to give an overview of the article (that is, a paragraph or two summarizing the rest of the article). See WP:LEAD. Also, the names of plays, novels and films should be in italics. You should not redlink his less important works - just the most important ones that should have their own encyclopedia articles. Let me know if you have any editing questions. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Rapp

Current article, for comparison. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]