User talk:Rsrikanth05/Archive December 2014

Please comment on Talk:Axis powers

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Axis powers. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

GA Cup - Round 3

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup - Round 3 Greetings, all! We hope that all of our American GA Cup competitors had an enjoyable Thanksgiving holiday. Friday saw the end of Round 2. Two from 7 pools, plus a tie score and one wildcard (16 in all) moved onto the next round. Some pools were more competitive than others. Round 2's highest scorer was 3family6, with an impressive 255 points. Good888, who came in second place overall with 202 points, reviewed the most articles (19). The wildcard slot for Round 2 went to Jaguar. Congrats to all! Round 3 will have 15 competitors in three pools. The key to moving forward in Round 2 seemed to be reviewing articles with the longest nomination dates; almost everyone who moved forward nominated at least one article from the pink nomination box (20 points) or reviewed articles that had languished in the queue for over 5 months (18 points). The GA Cup was also used to promote a group of articles about The Boat Race, a rowing race held annually since 1856 between Oxford University and Cambridge University, on the River Thames. 17 Boat Race articles were promoted to GA in November. In Round 2, 110 reviews were completed, as compared to 117 in Round 1. The GA Cup continues to be a success. This month, we got a report from User:AmericanLemming, who maintains the GA statistics, that in October, there was a net gain of 201 articles nominated for GA. He thought that more open GANs could mean that more editors are submitting more of their articles to the GAN process. In addition, having a high-throughput of GANs means that more articles get reviewed more quickly, which reduces the frustration of potentially waiting several months to get an article reviewed. The activity in Round 2 of the GA Cup seems to bear that out. It's our hope that the competitors' enthusiasm continues in Round 3, and we can continue to make a difference in helping more editors improve their articles. For Round 3, participants have been randomly put in 3 pools of 5 contestants each; the top two in each pool progressing, as well as the top 2 of all remaining users. Round 3 will start on December 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on December 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here. There have been a couple of rules clarifications to announce. We're slightly changing the wording to the second bullet in "General rules", which now reads: You may only score points in a round for reviews which have been completed in that round. We're also including this clarification: Only reviews started during the competition are eligible. We have also lost a judge, so there are now only three judges. Good luck and remember to have fun as we move into the holiday season. It is the judges' hope that every competitor in the GA Cup has a joyous holiday season and Happy New Year. Cheers from Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2014)

The Mexico–United States border spans six Mexican states and four U.S. states, with a total length of 3,145 km (1,954 mi). Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Mexico–United States border Previous selections: Tourism in the Caribbean • Military technology Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC) •

Comment removal

Why on earth did you remove my edits. You live in India, and I'm pretty sure you have no knowledge of the school in question. The information I added was fact - and parents have the right to know as much as possible about an institution that may be educating their children for 5 years. So stop playing wiki-God and undo your removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billy the Budgie (talk • contribs) 06:25, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Billy the Budgie: Yes, I live in India. Just because you live in the area/attend the school or whatever it DOES NOT MAKE YOU AN EXPERT on the subject. Your edit was unsourced, wreaks of Original Research and seems to show a potential Conflict of Interest. This apart, your behaviour is reasonably uncivil. So in short, I'm not playing any Wiki God, and I am NOT going to undo my edit, if you want to bring it back, someone else will remove it, and demanding that it be brought back is just not going to help. Perhaps you should read up the policies on schools. Wikipedia is not a blog or a place to post opinions. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Prick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billy the Budgie (talk • contribs) 04:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

@Billy the Budgie: Prick what? Prick with a needle? Not the right place I'm afraid. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
15		Amman Baccalaureate School (talk)						Add sources
727		Australia national cricket team (talk)						Add sources
655		Tamina Snuka (talk)						Add sources
49		Oath (song) (talk)						Add sources
832		Dodge Charger (talk)						Add sources
93		Mulund (talk)						Add sources
39		Loyalism (talk)						Cleanup
94		Software craftsmanship (talk)						Cleanup
375		Tucker & Dale vs. Evil (talk)						Cleanup
5,720		Google Maps (talk)						Expand
4		Welcome to Camden Falls (talk)						Expand
23		History of As the World Turns (talk)						Expand
167		Digital media player (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,236		Zolpidem (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
65		Democracy in Marxism (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
291		Maker culture (talk)						Merge
7		Electronic trade matching (talk)						Merge
376		Software engineer (talk)						Merge
224		Ford Mustang variants (talk)						Wikify
63		Kamran Akmal (talk)						Wikify
5		Expenditure management commission (talk)						Wikify
23		Synth1 (talk)						Orphan
2		Rafi Izbicki (talk)						Orphan
32		Alien of extraordinary ability (talk)						Orphan
23		Will Provine (talk)						Stub
7		Levan Kakubava (talk)						Stub
58		Johny Mera Naam (talk)						Stub
3		Mohabat Dero Jatoi (talk)						Stub
199		Airless tire (talk)						Stub
13		M. I. Shanavas (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:48, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Evacuation of East Prussia

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Evacuation of East Prussia. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Inter-civil war violence in Libya

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Inter-civil war violence in Libya. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Edit conflicts

Please check that I have not inadvertantly deleted some cp eds of yours. I normally work section by section. AshLin (talk) 15:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

@AshLin: No problems. If required, I'll do it again. :) Cheerio, --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mahatma Gandhi

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mahatma Gandhi. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox person

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox person. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:07, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gojoseon

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gojoseon. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Not DOne. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

• Op-ed: Who edits health-related content on Wikipedia and why?

• In the media: Embroidery and cheese

• Featured content: ABCD: Any Body Can Dance!

• Traffic report: Turkey and a movie

• WikiProject report: Today on the island

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2014)

Game design is the art of creating rules and mechanics to facilitate interactions between players in a game. Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Game design Previous selections: Mexico–United States border • Tourism in the Caribbean Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:25, 8 December 2014 (UTC) •

2014 Badaun gang rape

It seems that you have implied that I have attempted to start a caste war.

I am not a Yadav, I am not from UP, and I am not a supporter of the Yadav goverment. At the beginning the story was widely told with a caste perspective, and it was claimed that the victims were dalit. There were not, and in fact they belonged to the same strata - OBC as the suspects. Thus it was necessary to point out that caste did not play a role as was widely claimed.

There have been many reports that pointed to the rape accusation being unjustified, even before the CBI came to its conclusions. Feel free to claim otherwise if you still disagree.

Your implication is not right and not fair.

Malaiya (talk) 19:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

@Malaiya: At which point did I say you did? I only said some people. I was mainly referring to the IP but if you want to take things personally, that is not my fault. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Atlantis

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Atlantis. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Can't find it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lady Gaga

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lady Gaga. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Palestinian stone–throwing

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Palestinian stone–throwing. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Titanic (1997 film)

Hello, why you revert my edit? something wrong? paryvar^talk 10:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

@Paryvar: Yes, something is wrong with the edit. Please avoid using peacock terms, weasel words and read the Manual of style. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Sound is like a joke! eleven Oscar or multi billion dollar mark doesn't meaning rare! have fun bot! paryvar^talk 10:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, @Paryvar:, let it sound like a joke. If you have issues bring it to the talk page of the article (Talk:Titanic (1997 film). Also, please maintain civility on talk pages, calling me a bot isn't going to help in any way. Just because we have a difference in opinion, it doesn't make you or me superior to the other. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:St. Francis Dam

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:St. Francis Dam. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Administrators/RfC for an Admin Review Board

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Administrators/RfC for an Admin Review Board. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Terrorism

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Terrorism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

• Op-ed: It's GLAM up North!

• In the media: Wikipedia is "a rancorous, sexist, elitist, stupidly bureaucratic mess"

• Traffic report: Dead Black Men and Science Fiction

• Featured content: Honour him, love and obey? Good idea with military leaders.

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Bhushi Dam

Mike V • Talk 19:30, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

TING! --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2014)

A plate of spaghetti and meatballs. Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Spaghetti Previous selections: Game design • Mexico–United States border Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC) •

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charles Fahy

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Charles Fahy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Saffron Terror

Hi, can you explain me your stand here. You want it to be renamed to Hindu extremism ? -sarvajna (talk) 07:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

It would be difficult for me to explain you, because I don't know you. However, jokes apart, what explaining do I need to do? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

I wanted to know whether you want the article to be renamed as "Hindu Extremism"? -sarvajna (talk) 07:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

That depends on what consensus says. -_Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

2014 Peshawar school attack

Your recent editing history at 2014 Peshawar school attack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
[1] [2] [3] It would be a good idea to stop reverting random editors and get them to use the talkpage along with you... lTopGunl (talk) 08:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

--lTopGunl (talk) 08:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

@TopGun:. I AM NOT edit warring. I undid the first edit by 129.94.236.153 because the category being added was the parent category of one that was already present there. The second one where I unlinked, was because it was red. It was done simply because it was red. I did NOT undo anyone and I don't understand how it is edit warring. The third edit by 69.165.246.175 which I undid was because Koavf had already removed the link to Russian Federation. Why don't you go thru the edits completely once before saying I'm indulging in edit warring? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

That's what editwarring is.. reverting instead of discussing. I don't really care what edits you are making and if you think you are right... reverting repeatedly instead of using talkpage for discussion and consensus is editwarring per WP:EW and all your reverts count up to WP:3RR regardless of the fact that your edits were in good faith or not, correct or not. Also, specifically your 1 edit that reverted me was not justified per WP:REDLINK. I'm not going to argue with you over it.. if you like you can go on till you get blocked. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

@TopGun: WHAT is there to discuss about removing a category whose child category is ALREADY present? I've made more contribs to the talk page of the article than you have in generating consensus. I did NOT revert ANY edit of YOURs. Before attempting to indimitate another user, I'd suggest youread up on edit warring. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Reverting while discussing still counts as editwar per WP:EW.. given that I just started editing here, I don't think you should take me as involved in all of your edits. Btw, this is borderline canvassing. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Sure, go ahead. There was no discussion to begin with in the first place. If there was one on the talk page, I would have replied there. Clearly you aren't bothered with that. You just want me to stop editing. Fine. I won't edit that article till I get a green from an admin. AFAIK, I'm not canvassing. I'm only asking for opinions since this is the first time I'm being accused of something in such an absurd manner. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Why would I want to stop you from editing when I have hardly interacted with you? Selectively asking for opinion from an editor who has already engaged in WP:BATTLE per his own report is canvassing. Anyway, if you don't see a talkpage discussion you can start one.. that's no excuse for not discussing... you only reverted me once.. so why would I even have anything else to do with you given that you apparently got my point of revert and stopped reverting that specific edit. I found your random reverts of others disruptive and informed you. There's no need to drag it along. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:48, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

I've just reviewed Rsrikath05's edits to the article (at his request). I see no evidence of edit warring at all. At no point can I see instances of Rsrikanth05 reverting to retain information that he added in a previous edit, nor is he repeatedly reverting the same editor. This is bold editing of the type that is actively encouraged on Wikipedia. If Rsrikanth05's own edits are reverted and he then re-reverts to keep them in without discussion, then we have an edit war. At present, however, that does not appear to have happened. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

My warning was aimed to prevent reverting every WP:BOLD editor who adds something to the article.. I do agree some of his edits were helpful but re-reverting is not the criteria for WP:EW, and none of his edits conformed to the exemptions of WP:EW.. the template is also clearly worded and does not mean that he might be totally wrong. It only bites the new comers and IPs, which is why it should be avoided. In all these three instances [4] [5] [6] the reverts are removal of content added by other editors. While I did assume good faith and did not really warn him on his reverting of my edit, It's just a warning, not a report for block.. so I think this much was due. This was by no means to stop him from editing the article and if that's how it was taken, I guess it's been clarified now. Cheers. --lTopGunl (talk) 09:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Actually, re-reverting is exactly the criteria for edit warring: An edit war only arises if the situation develops into a series of back-and-forth reverts (from WP:EW). Making an edit that reverts another editor for the first time is not edit warring. If you want to warn Rsrikanth05 for biting newcomers, that's another thing entirely, but the accusation of edit-warring is unfounded. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

I never reverted TopGun. Henceforth I will NOT edit any article that they are editing. If they happen to edit something I am working on then I will abandon it, even if it is a DYK or a GA in progress. I'd rather have my sanity than some wild accusations of 'Go on, till you get blocked'. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

On a side note. TopGun asked me to discuss chaanges. I have state above that the 'changes' were all minor in nature with NONE being discussion worthy. If there was any discussion, then why is it NOT on the talk page? Why do I have so many edits on the talk page discussing the article and the person who is accusing me of not discussion not have ANY edits WHATSOEVER on the talk page? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:47, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

And given that you have claimed to have preemptively given me the warning [to prevent me from doing further damage], I should perhaps also leave a warning on your page not to leave warnings on the talk pages of every user whose edits you think are disruptive. I rest my case. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:49, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Now is probably a good point to draw this to a close. @TopGun:, I'm afraid you're in the wrong here; it is impossible to edit war by making single reverts - that's just regular editing. Opening a discussion is the responsibility of the editor being reverted not the one doing the reverting. @Rsrikanth05:, resting your case is the best option here; there's no need to let this escalate into a dispute. I recognise that the article is both current and emotive, but please put this disagreement behind you both and carry on editing. Yunshui ^雲_水 11:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Done. As I said, I'm gonna ignore all of those, try and maybe find some sources for Millie Bus and maybe get it to DYK or something. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

The fact that I stopped replying here and removed this page from my watchlist was that I had rested my case long ago... there's obviously no need to escalate it into a dispute where I only perceived the reverts to be undoing changes of other editors repeatedly and to be honest I've not edited the article much yet so I don't know why there should be a dispute between the two of us here. Cheers. --lTopGunl (talk) 12:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

I took the liberty to strike off the false and meaningless warning of edit warring when it is verified by a third person that there's none. ƬheStrikeΣagle 13:54, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Jee, thanks. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

• Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee election results

• Featured content: Tripping hither, tripping thither, Nobody knows why or whither; We must dance and we must sing, Round about our fairy ring!

• In the media: Wikipedia's year in review video; Checking in with Wikipedia's founders

• Traffic report: A December Lull

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Not a great video. Could have integrated it with something like Wiki Replay or something. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milli Bus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Panjshir. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hedwig of Holstein

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hedwig of Holstein. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geopolitical entities not recognised as states

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geopolitical entities not recognised as states. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2014)

An aurora is a natural phenomenon. Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Natural phenomenon Previous selections: Spaghetti • Game design Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC) •

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chandra Levy

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chandra Levy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Just the ticket!

Heya, just went thru your 'About' section and discovered you too collect railway tickets like me. Nice to meet you! Care to join me on Train tickets sometime? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Excellent – pleased to find a fellow collector! A railway ticket/train ticket article would be a very useful addition to WP, but the scope of it would be almost overwhelming! I have a wealth of source material that could be used, though. Incidentally I am currently preparing to write some ticket-related papers for publication in the "real world". My collecting specialism is modern British railway tickets (see this article, one of mine, for an example); what are your particular interests? Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 22:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

@Hassocks5489: Wow, that is amazing; I wish I could write a paper on ticketing systems, I have quite a lot of data. I'm not planning on writng on any specific article, but can help out wherever needed. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:52, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 18:56, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Seen. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of states with limited recognition

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of states with limited recognition. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Tenchi Muyo! characters

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Tenchi Muyo! characters. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

• From the editor: Looking for new editors-in-chief

• In the media: Wales on GamerGate

• Featured content: Still quoting Iolanthe, apparently.

• WikiProject report: Microsoft does The Signpost

• Traffic report: North Korea is not pleased

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

AfD notification group of articles

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wilayat_Kirkuk_(ISIL)

Marking for timestamp. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:56, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Education

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Education. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Please reply on Microsoft Mobile article

Please reply on Microsoft Mobile article. Explanation from me is available on Microsoft --> (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:35, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for cookies. :) -Nizil (talk) 19:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Yuvar welcome. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Duplication

Should text be duplicated on a main article page, if it's also on a more detailed article page? If so, how do you show there is a more detailed article? I'm sure my edits you reverted weren't correct, but not sure how to do it best. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorfromleigh (talk • contribs) 22:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

@Editorfromleigh: Whatever is on the article will be reflected on the main page, as it is. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Jhony back's message.

Dear sir,

Article is about a true man who served people in south tamilnadu, he was a very famous politician with no black hand/corruption. People can look into the article to know such honest person lived in political world with no corruption. i do not understand similar politicians of same tamilnadu side is being appeared in wiki search page with no deletion, trying to understand the reason to delete this particular article with no good reason.

He was such a honest person lived only for people with no post. he followed political leaders say Abraham Lincoln who succeeded at age 51 to be states man. The man mentioned in this article also lived so but he never succeeded finally he died but lived for people until his last breathe.

Trying to put his article in wiki to get to know gentle - gem person lived in politics.

Why are we not supporting such article about a honest person lived for people to put in wiki. , people should not know about such person in google search?

kindly let me know. Emotionally not writing,at the minimum his history lines to be read as article.

Wiki is allowing even movie, clips, fascinating items article, why does it allow about genuine person lived for people.

sorry if writing's are not good, intention is to make visible about a wonderful person; please give space in wiki, do not delete the article. Kindly help.

Thanks --Jhonny bak

@Jhony.bak:, I do not understand what you are trying to say. Which article are you referring to. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:44, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)I presume it's about BGB Janakiraman which is now deleted anyway. ƬheStrikeΣagle 16:49, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok, that makes sense, but I don't think I ever edited that page. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit

ThaddeusB (talk) 19:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Well, not something to brag about, but it had to reach there. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Jordan Hill

Hi you sent me a message regarding the page singer Jordan hill. We need to get this cleared up please. This page is not authorized by Miss Jordan Hill herself. And all info including various ages that have been posted are false and inaccurate. Nothing that has been posted has proper proof or citations. On behalf of miss hill, We ask that you refrain from posting any further content about her, unless it is authorized by us. We ask that this page remain deleted. If you need to contact us for further info, email us at lori@tigzy.com. Thank you.

Yo @Godswarrior1: I'm afraid I can't do anything. I don't run Wikipedia. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fredrick Brennan

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fredrick Brennan. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2015)

The skyline of Frankfurt, Germany Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Skyline Previous selections: Natural phenomenon • Spaghetti Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:18, 29 December 2014 (UTC) •

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
5		Kamshet railway station (talk)						Add sources
5		Vithalwadi railway station (talk)						Add sources
9		Dehu Road railway station (talk)						Add sources
35		Thane railway station (talk)						Add sources
7		Kharghar railway station (talk)						Add sources
19		Jaipur City Transport Services Limited (talk)						Add sources
49		Bandra Terminus (talk)						Cleanup
2		Kashele (talk)						Cleanup
54		Bhandup (talk)						Cleanup
65		Pirate Party of Sweden (talk)						Expand
109		Tourism in Maharashtra (talk)						Expand
16		Chinchwad (talk)						Expand
103		Andheri (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
315		Gerontology (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
406		God in Islam (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
230		Dock connector (talk)						Merge
83		Malad (talk)						Merge
1,787		Hyderabad (talk)						Merge
453		DeLorean time machine (talk)						Wikify
13		Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation (talk)						Wikify
97		Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (talk)						Wikify
2		Jammu and Kashmir State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd (talk)						Orphan
8		Thakkar Bappa Colony (talk)						Orphan
1		Inderavelly (talk)						Orphan
111		Tamaar Padaar (talk)						Stub
25		Neral, India (talk)						Stub
3		Thomas Wheatley (locomotive engineer) (talk)						Stub
3		Jante, Nepal (talk)						Stub
4		Shelu railway station (talk)						Stub
4		Two Rivers High School (Wisconsin) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ulises Heureaux

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ulises Heureaux. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

GA Cup - Round 4 (Semi-Finals)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup - Round 4 Happy New Year! We hope that all of our GA Cup competitors had an enjoyable and safe holiday season. Monday saw the end of Round 3. Eight contestants moved forward to Round 4—the top two contestants from each of Round 3's three pools and the top two participants of all remaining users. It was an exciting competition, especially towards the end. Round 3's highest scorer was Jaguar, Round 2's wildcard, with an impressive 305 points, the highest score in the GA Cup thus far. Pool B was the closest race; J_Milburn and Cwmhiraeth switched places a few times in the final hours of the competition, although J Milburn edged out Cwmhiraeth by just 9 points. Pool A was, by far, the most competitive; four out of five moved onto Round 4, and its competitors earned a cumulative 935 points and reviewed 59 articles. Ritchie333, who came in second overall with 255 points, reviewed the most articles (17). Peacemaker67 and Wizardman earned the two wildcard slots, with 184 and 154 points, respectively. Congrats to all! 114 articles were reviewed this round, as compared to 110 in Round 2 and 117 in Round 1. The key to success in Round 3, like in Round 2, was reviewing articles with the longest nomination dates; everyone who moved forward reviewed articles from the pink nomination box (20 points) or reviewed articles that had languished in the queue for over 5 months (18 points). Many of these articles had languished because their nominators had left Wikipedia and had little chance of passing to GA, so our competitors provided a great service by helping remove them from the queue. Also as in Round 2, The Boat Race articles proved to be popular review choices, with 10% of all the articles reviewed in December. We appreciate the competitors' continued enthusiasm, even during the busy holiday season. At least one competitor even reviewed articles while preparing for a holiday meal! For Round 4, participants have been randomly put in 2 pools of 4 contestants each. The top two in each pool will progress to the finals, as well as the top participant (5th place) of all remaining users. The semi-finals will start on January 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on January 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 4 and the pools can be found here. We received some excellent feedback about how to improve the GA Cup in the future, including the definition of "quickfails" and the use of pools, which we'll seriously consider as we move forward. As a result of this feedback and the experience we've gained, there will be some changes to the rules come next years GA Cup. Good luck to all our semi-finalists! It is the judges' hope that every competitor in the GA Cup continue to have fun and be enthusiastic about reviewing and passing articles to GA! Cheers from Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pinki Jangra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hisar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Chief of NJ courts

Hello, I just received an email from you about edits, and since I'm new I need to know more about the sandbox area and how it works. Can I edit the existing article in it's entirety, have the Chief Justice approve it and then publish it live? Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webwork.mailbox (talk • contribs) 18:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

@Webwork.mailbox: Whatever you save, goes live instantly. There is no publish it later. I do not understand your question about the Chief Justice and permission, could you please elaborate? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brian Harvey

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Brian Harvey. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Milli Bus

Harrias ^talk 00:02, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 04:10, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For getting Milli Bus, a rather unnoticed and ignored subject to DYK! You deserve this! Cheers and season greetings, ƬheStrikeΣagle 13:19, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Jee thanks a lot Strike! --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:35, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Sushma Swaraj

Holy shit is this Sushma Swaraj!?!?! The IP traces to Delhi too! ƬheStrikeΣagle 13:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Only one way to find out. :D --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)