Jump to content

User talk:Rschen7754/Archive 47

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 40Archive 45Archive 46Archive 47Archive 48Archive 49Archive 50

20:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 47

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021

  • On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
  • Search tool deployed
  • New My Library design improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

22:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

20:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

21:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

21:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

Administrator changes

removed A TrainBerean HunterEpbr123GermanJoeSanchomMysid

Technical news

  • Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
  • The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)

Arbitration



MOS:RJL spamming

Why are you spamming hundreds of articles with tags? What benefit does this give to the reader? The best advice I've seen is from the classic User:Beyond My Ken/Thoughts "Editors should also remember that the Manual of Style presents guidelines to assist us, not strict rules to be slavishly followed with dogmatic intrasigence. The presentation of references should be judged as every other contribution to Wikipedia should be judged: Is it clear? Does it present the information in an unambiguous and coherent manner? Is the visual presentation clean and uncluttered? If it meets these conditions, then it should not be reverted: almost nothing on Wikipedia is more lame, or reflect worse on good-faith editors, than edit-warring on the basis of "The MoS says so!". I get utterly depressed looking through Pink Floyd articles like "Echoes", finding unsourced information that's sat in there for years, while people squabble over formatting and templates, leading to two depressing Arbcom cases. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

In the course of such "spamming" I have noticed how said articles are often not accessibility compliant and often do not present the information in both miles and kilometers. Rather than seeing this through a political lens, can you take a dispassionate look at the merits of MOS:RJL? --Rschen7754 19:28, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
I rarely go onto the MOS because frankly I don't understand it or how it helps the reader gain knowledge. By my own admission, I completely suck at templates and infoboxes, because I just don't have the time to understand what they mean and how they benefit the reader? How are they not accessibility compliant? Bear in mind I have, as stated on my user page, bad eyesight and have required glasses since I was eleven years old, and cannot generally look at more than 1080p resolution on a 24" monitor. And presenting in miles and kilometres is political, because professional highways engineers use the latter, no matter what the UKIP or Brexit Party might claim otherwise. So, to repeat, can you explain these issues in terms my mother could understand? If you can't, it may highlight a problem. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:34, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
TBH that template would be better suited for filling a tracking category. It's utility as an ambox is pretty limited as its target audience is largely we who edit road articles. –Fredddie 20:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
because professional highways engineers use the latter very well, but most of us aren't and we shouldn't expect someone (in the US, or in the UK, or in any country in the world really) to have to pull out a calculator to understand the distances. As far as the accessibility issues, you can't convey information in only graphics or colors that a visually impaired person cannot understand, among other things. --Rschen7754 23:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
I know all of that - I've just told you I've got bad eyesight so please do not patronise me about accessibility when it can directly affect me - but I was asking for specifics. You haven't specified exactly what you're looking for or what action you want taken. Is to add {{convert}} to various entries? Is it to replace one template field with another? Is is to add alt tags to images? Or is it something else entirely? By dropping a load of unhelpful and unexplained tags on 150 articles for seemingly no reason, all you've done is irritate people. I notice I'm not the only one to revert your drive by tagging simply because you haven't explained what action you want taken - and looking that article, it already has distances in metric and imperial anyway. And, furthermore, the document you quoted says "While this document has been developed to provide a basis for a uniform presentation of road junction information, not all information is applicable to all roads in all regions. Thus, certain provisions of this guideline are noted as being for optional use." So what is the problem? It'll take you, what, five minutes to fix up a couple of templates, why haven't you done this yourself? Perhaps if you'd actually done the work instead of hectoring other people in an unnecessarily patronising manner, you might have actually got the result you wanted. Something to think about.
Incidentally, "can you explain these issues in terms my mother could understand" comes from Joel Spolsky's "Guerrilla Guide to Interviewing", whereby if candidates continued to use jargon and fail to explain to themselves, they'd fail the interview. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
It'll take you, what, five minutes to fix up a couple of templates, why haven't you done this yourself? When I did similar conversions for California, it took me several months. I would estimate probably 20-30 minutes per article. Nobody expects that it will be done right away or even within the next year (does any cleanup template mean this?) - this is just noting that there is a problem that should be addressed at some point. Why did I add the tags? Because RJL has been part of the MOS for 10 years and I didn't want nothing to be done about the 2000+ articles worldwide that are still not compliant. (For the record, 4000+ articles are compliant).
Looking specifically at M25, I have a lot of questions. What do the italics and bold mean? Why are things in ALL CAPS (which is another violation of MOS)? What do the seemingly random colors mean? Why are there two columns that say almost the same thing? What city or location are these junctions in (besides just the county)? I think I know what the big red C means (congestion charge) but the average non-UK reader would not. While we recommend using a template like {{Jctint}} as it makes any future changes easier, it is not required, so long as the columns are similar and the other MOS/accessibility issues are addressed. --Rschen7754 19:19, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
And for all the accusations about my being "patronizing" with a 8 character tag and a 3 letter edit summary - your comments above come off to me as quite condescending, as "How dare you tell me that I may be wrong about something since I automatically know better than you". That is not effective communication. Just a thought. --Rschen7754 19:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Since this discussion is clearly going places, is my suggestion of making the template just house a tracking category (and thereby removing the visual element of the template) palatable for both of you? –Fredddie 19:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

22:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

22:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
  • On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Merchandise giveaway nomination

A t-shirt!
A token of thanks

Hi Rschen7754! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk ~~~~~
A snowflake!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en@lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

21:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021

  • 1Lib1Ref 2022
  • Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


21:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

19:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

19:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

22:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


21:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

22:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

16:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

  • New library collections
  • Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

19:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

21:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)