Jump to content

User talk:Rovepashap

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Knitsey (talk) 19:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Censorship in Vietnam, you may be blocked from editing. It's not clear what crusade you are on across a number of articles, but it's probably wise if you stop right now, before another admin blocks you: you've already been reported. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandalising Wikipedia. The user who reported me is vandalising. For example, I removed information that's not found in the source, or has been evidently debunked. Rovepashap (talk) 01:56, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And yet a whole bunch of your edits are wrong or improperly explained. This edit, for instance, makes no sense at all. But don't take my word for it: keep going like this and wait for the block. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I originally removed that one it was incomplete, so it was a head-scratcher for me. Looking back and now with your feedback, I'll leave it there. Perhaps I can expand the list myself. That was my bad and I'm sorry. I don't plan to remove ones like that again.
I think it would be much better if I put an "Incomplete List" label. Thank you again for your feedback. Rovepashap (talk) 02:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, well, it would have been much better if you weren't so blatantly socking. Give me a minute so I can block your other accounts. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dreamy Jazz, would you mind having a look at this and the other accounts I just tagged? They match with accounts that you blocked pertaining to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Worldwar1989? Thanks. Rovepapshap, I hope you don't mind us talking. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies, I can't seem to see the accounts I blocked related to that case. Could you link them? We can move to my user talk page if you prefer. Thanks. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 02:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]