User talk:Rossrocker09

February 2013

Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ross, California, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The standard for inclusion in a notable people list is the same as for a biographical article. Generally speaking, that means that if there isn't an article on the subject don't insert them in a list of notable people. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ross, California, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nothing in either Penn's or Wright's Wiki articles, nor any of those article's references made any mention of a connection with Ross. Please do not reinsert this material without providing a reference to reliable sources showing that for both. Thanks! Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Ross, California, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. the removal or addition of content is never a minor edit. Please include a brief edit summary describing your actions when editing. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:14, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do I detect some sarcasm? In any case, Thanks, I think, but I am not an admin. I am, however, more than happy to help you find your way around wikipedia and feel free to contact me anytime for help. Happy editing, but imma tell you about it if it leaves something to be desired. We all learn from our errors. Cheers! Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:56, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Gtwfan52, you may be blocked from editing. Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Gtwfan52. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Gtwfan52 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to How Beer Saved the World. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:24, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another short unhappy career. If only they could see their greatness. ```Buster Seven Talk 00:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rossrocker09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me my friend was the one vandalizing wikipedia i will behave

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:37, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

We don't buy this argument. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 05:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]