User talk:RossRSmith

Welcome!

Hello, RossRSmith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Satu Suro 07:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Champion of the Colony

See Talk:Champion of the Colony. —Moondyne click! 04:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1938 VFL season

I didn't add that piece of information to the page. I looked though the edit history and it looks like Lindsay658 added it. Terlob (talk) 11:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats alright, good to see someone checking the accuracy of AFL articles, thanks. Terlob (talk) 02:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

York Park

Do you know what page of the Examiner? And how did you find that out. thanks Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 04:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ross, infact I wasn't aware. Please update the article if you have sources and I'd love to know more. Aaroncrick (talk) 22:00, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expanded the history section. Will be looking to take the article to FAC soon. So any addition info would be appreciated. Aaroncrick (talk) 12:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Champion of the Colony / Champion Players.

Dear Ross,

Thank you for your message. It is good to get the opportunity to contact you.

I am well aware of the controversy caused by Graeme Atkinson. I am about to remove the early references to Tom Wills as a Champion Player.

However, I would defend the continuance of the Chapion of the Colony on this page. I am sure that you realise that most historians would support this.

Please do not hesitate to continue this discussion.

Regards,

(Albert Isaacs). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Albert Isaacs (talk • contribs) 02:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ross,

I note your recent message left for me. Thank you.

You are well aware of the intense discussion on the topic of "Champion of the Colony" which appears on the discussion page of the Wikipedia site of the same name. I note your contributions to this discussion, along with those from many others who disagree with you. I believe that this particular discussion page is the correct place for this debate but not the 1859-1900 History.

The comments that are expressed on the 1859-1900 history are endorsed by many of those who have contributed to the Champion of the Colony debate. Of course, I respect your right to have a different opinion and know that we will both be respectful toward each other even though we agree to disagree on this one point.

Regards, Albert Isaacs. 58.110.106.123 (talk) 08:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Ablett

Do you have a source for your claim though? If you're going to dispute official AFL publications, then you have to at least provide an equal or better source too. That's the issue here. Boomtish (talk) 09:50, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I had actually started typing my Coulthard question up here, being well aware of your resources, and half way through had second thoughts and posted it to WT:AFL thinking I'd cast a wider net! Thanks again mate. –Moondyne 14:18, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hawthorn B & F

Dear Ross,

Thanks for the message. It looks a good suggestion to me we can alter the Peter Crimmins Medal section, by adding the several variations that the award might have gone through. If you agree please go ahead and edit the section.

regards, Krishnadatta (talk) 14:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)krishnadatta[reply]

Wally Hammond

Hello. I noticed that you made a change to the Wally Hammond article about the record number of catches in a season. In the edit summary, you gave what I assume to be the catch missing from Wisden. Just so I can add a note, where does this information come from? Cheers. --Sarastro1 (talk) 10:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gibson

Thanks. It's always good to find another Gibson fan. :) It was Johnlp who mentioned that match on my talk page, so perhaps you could copy your comment about it to his own talk page to ensure that he will see it. JH (talk page) 17:07, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've obviously got the details a bit fuzzy after 36 years, but I shall enjoy revisiting... if I get a copy of the book! You're lucky having easy access: the Murdoch press like to take as much money as they can from people in the UK. Johnlp (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First class cricket

Thanks for providing the proper references to first-class cricket. No worries, cheers! Uqahr talk 12:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your great site on Tasmanian football and the like

Hey there. For the Laurie Nash article I referenced your website for the number of games he played in Tasmania but I see that the link is now dead. As I am hoping to make Nash a featured article I was wondering if you had the site elsewhere or where I could source a reference for Nash's Tasmanian games? Cheers --Roisterer (talk) 09:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. I've added your new site to my favourites list as well. Cheers. --Roisterer (talk) 13:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Australian football

Australian football must use lower case as it is not a proper noun. This is also standard wikipedia formatting. Plus this link indicates both 'Australian Football' and 'Australian football' are both acceptable and the text below comes from that site (which includes both upper and lower case variants underlined):

Whether it is called Australian Football, Australian Rules Football, "Aussie Rules", the VFL, the AFL, Australia's only indigenous football code is officially entitled 'Australian football'. It has never been officially referred to as 'Australian rules football'. Such terminology has only ever appeared in the form of football journalism, coined by different writers.

--143.238.239.224 (talk) 11:30, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

G'day Ross, When you find "new old" information, can you please try to put the citation in the article, not just in the edit summary, such as this edit. As the 35 and 36 B&F winners aren't listed in the "official" AFL histories, I'd assume that they also aren't listed in the only source mentioned in the article. The argus citation should therefore be placed in the table, next to the new info. Nice find, by the way. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 00:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New dees logo

Hi, just saw this edit and I had seen you remove it before. Anyway, I was just wondering, if it's not their official logo yet, why is it used on the afl.com.au page and the melbournefc.com.au page? Not doubting you, I'm simply curious :) Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 10:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, thanks for the info and it does seem like the AFL and Melbourne have jumped the gun. I also noticed a certain "Mr Ross Smith" seemed to be the opposition. Couldn't possibly be you could it? :) Jenks24 (talk) 10:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tasmanian FOOTBALL League

TSL causes confusion with soccer. Please leave me reversions alone. The only time to use "State League" is to use the full promotional name "Wrest Point State League", which we can't do here because that's advertising. It must stay TFL because that is the name the fans know it as according to an official of AFL Tasmania. Promotional names don't count. If you disagree please discuss it on the TFL talk page for a consensus. Footy Freak7 (talk) 22:15, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hampshire v MCC, 1880

Hi, thanks for the response on the talk page. I have contacted CricketArchive regarding what you found, what is needed now is a link to the info. I've tried to find the link, but am having no such luck. Would you be able to find the information you put on the WikiProject Cricket Talkpage? Cheers, AssociateAffiliate (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crawford

Thanks, there's some good stuff in there. Much appreciated! --Sarastro1 (talk) 17:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:RossRSmith/Brian Waters (footballer) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brian Waters (footballer), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 11:52, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Brian Waters (footballer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

My76Strat (talk) 12:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rex Davidson

I've moved him, though I'm a bit confused because I don't think I'd had anything to do with this article before! Kind regards. Johnlp (talk) 13:20, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gilligan

Once more, much appreciated! Sarastro1 (talk) 19:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acting captains

Hey Ross. You may to want to give your opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian rules football#Acting captains, a discussion I just opened. Best, Jenks24 (talk) 13:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dave McNamara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Greening, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern Tasmanian Football Association (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Howard (cricketer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gillette Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Question about AFL

This is just a question as you are obviously clued up on the AFL. I wondered what sort of crowds an average league match attracted. Thanks Cdomm (talk) 10:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page at AFL Tables is pretty comprehensive in answering that sort of question. You'll find wide range of information there - http://stats.rleague.com/afl/crowds/summary.html

RossRSmith (talk) 21:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC) ThanksCdomm (talk) 22:25, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Leitch Medal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Hartnett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First match at The Oval

Thanks for the spot! The newspaper turned out to be wrong when it said "this ground will be appropriated alone to the purposes of cricket"! :) JH (talk page) 16:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation

Who or what says that "Australian Football" is the official name? Australian football is a common noun like any other sport. American, association, Gaelic, Canadian, and the other footballs aren't capitalized. - HappyWaldo (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed about the name being a common noun, but the AFL says – well did say – the official name of the sport is Australian football... I've also started a conversation thread on the sport's talk page. 137.147.193.90 (talk) 06:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tasmanian Football Hall of Fame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Heathcote (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tasmanian Football Hall of Fame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Carter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Western Bulldogs logo

Please, before reverting an edit, check at the sources to determine if the logo "is still approved" or not, as you stated. The new Western Bulldogs logo is in use at official WB website and Facebook page. If you disagree with this, the issue could be discussed at the WB talk page, but please don't revert it again. Thanks, Fma12 (talk) 11:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was it so difficult to tell me that the only "mistake" of the logo was the since 1883 legend? Please try to be more collaborative instead of reverting and reverting all the time (at least, take a moment to reply my message that I previously left you to search a consensus). The new logo (the same as the official web) is now uploaded. Therefore I hope your continue reversions ceased. Thanks. Fma12 (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Percy Jory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

re: Tasmanian cricketers

Thanks for the info. If you know of any others from 190 onwards on the list that you know are def. different between Cricinfo and CArchive, then please post the info on the talkpage of the main article, and I'll pick it up. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 21:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RossRSmith. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Algy

Hi Ross, do you think you can use your research skills to confirm if Algy Vosilaitis is still with us or not? I've tried tweeting the Dogs and Gigs at AustralianFootball.com for confirmation of my 2 circumstantial unreliable references (an RIP message in response to a facebook post and a Herald Sun death notice), but haven't got any confirmation. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 03:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day ! Thanks for asking me to help out - yes, Algy died on 9 April 2017. The Melbourne cemeteries site http://www.gmct.com.au/deceased-search.aspx gives his details as birth 29/01/1943; death 09/04/2017; service [cremation] 13/04/2017. RossRSmith (talk) 05:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RossRSmith. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Daly (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advertiser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allen Burns (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Record (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alf Hedge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Record (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RossRSmith. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malcolm Cooper (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Messenger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of English cricketers

Hi. Thanks for adding links in to the Lists of English cricketers from the mid-19th century. I've worked on List of English cricketers (1841–1850) over the last week or so and now have it set up as a tabular format to allow short bios to be added in. Eventually I might decide to work on the other lists from 1851 onward - perhaps combining them in some way. If I do I'll probably use the same sort of format - it seems to have worked for the previous lists in the series OK.

If the names of as many of these chaps as possible are already there in the article it will make the job so much easier to do - so thanks for adding those that you have and, well, if you can add anymore then that'd be appreciated!

I should imagine quite a lot played prior to 1851 so the names will already have been tracked down for those guys btw. Well, in most cases: there may be a few rogue ones lurking somewhere or other that are still red links in the 41-50 list. Thanks again... Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tottenham Hotspur honours

You're a bit late to the party, but there is a discussion at WT:FOOTBALL, however lots of people seem to set their own rules rather that the previous developed consensus which is about six years old. Govvy (talk) 10:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I have raised the matter at the project talk page. The Project's "club page manual of style" currently includes in the Honours section at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Clubs#Honours the following (Achievements of the club including wins and second places. For clubs with a large number of major trophies, it may be appropriate to omit second places.) If this is different to the "previous developed consensus" you mention, perhaps you could guide me to the appropriate discussion of six years or so ago. RossRSmith (talk) 01:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francis Adams (cricketer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evening News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Templates For Discussion - AFL Player Significant Statistics Templates

A new discussion has begun regarding the AFL Player Significant Statistics Templates. Please add your thoughts there. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Babington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Curran.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Travers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Journal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]