User talk:RosettaTape

Smile!

Hello RosettaTape, Acalamari has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Acalamari 18:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Little Gold Book of Ghastly Stuff

Hello, RosettaTape. I noticed that virtually every link on the page A Little Gold Book of Ghastly Stuff is either a red link, a link to a disambiguation page, or links to an inappropriate page (e.g. Feminine Endings links to Susan McClary, not Neil Gaiman). I've marked these as 'disambiguation needed', but don't know enough about Gaiman's work to know quite what should be linked to. Cnilep (talk) 05:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Blues Traveler, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That seems unnecessary - individual albums should be sourced on their individual pages, otherwise all previous albums should cite sources for their existence. BTW, album page exists and has a source as well.RosettaTape (talk) 15:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's necessary because the album's page could ultimately be changed or deleted so that the pertinent information is no longer sourced on the individual album's page...in any event readers shouldn't have to jump between articles to find citations. Better to copy the citation to each article for which it applies. New edit looks good, thanks! Doniago (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Emmet-wake.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Emmet-wake.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dark-when-the-snow-falls.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dark-when-the-snow-falls.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bathing-in-the-new-economy-ep.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bathing-in-the-new-economy-ep.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ear-plugs-50.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ear-plugs-50.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Big-night-without-you.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Big-night-without-you.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Arlington-to-boston.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Arlington-to-boston.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dermot O'Leary Presents The Saturday Sessions 2013

Hello, RosettaTape,

Thanks for creating Dermot O'Leary Presents The Saturday Sessions 2013! I edit here too, under the username QueerEcofeminist and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add more reliable sources to the article, thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|QueerEcofeminist}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 12:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Not The Same Old Song And Dance: A Tribute To Aerosmith

The article Not The Same Old Song And Dance: A Tribute To Aerosmith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dermot O'Leary Presents The Saturday Sessions

Hello, RosettaTape,

Thanks for creating Dermot O'Leary Presents The Saturday Sessions! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on the album "Dermot O'Leary Presents The Saturday Sessions", though I recommend adding text from professional reviews and similar news items to show more evidence of notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dermot O'Leary Presents The Saturday Sessions 2016

The article Dermot O'Leary Presents The Saturday Sessions 2016 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article appears to be a mistake. It's title ("Dermot O'Leary Presents...") is a different album than that described in the text. The text describes the entirely different album "BBC Radio 1's Live Lounge 2016" and that album title has already been redirected to BBC Radio 1. The Dermot O'Leary album also exists but is almost certainly non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:21, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Saturday Sessions From The Dermot O'Leary Show) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Saturday Sessions From The Dermot O'Leary Show.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the album "The Saturday Sessions From The Dermot O'Leary Show." All of your articles for the albums in this series require more evidence that each one has been noted in the media and has made an impact with the public. See WP:NALBUM and WP:EXIST.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spotify Singles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bangles and Beri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:52, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spotify Singles

The article Spotify Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable list of mostly non-notable songs. Sources are almost all about the songs and not about the concept itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]