User talk:Rorndoff

Welcome!

Hello Rorndoff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! HGB 08:53, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright of Image:IMG 05951.JPG

Hi there, thanks for uploading Image:IMG 05951.JPG. I noticed that there is some required information missing from the image description. The Wikimedia Foundation has to be very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:

who created the image
the copyright status

If you created the image:
If you haven't already, please add a note in the description of the image saying that you created it.
Next you need to choose a copyright license so that people on Wikipedia know what they can and cannot do with your image. There are only a few tags that apply to images you created yourself. Once you have decided which one you wish to use, simply copy the tag exactly as shown into the image description. Please note that you MUST allow people to freely use and copy your image (you may apply some conditions to that), else it may not be used on Wikipedia.

If you didn't create the image:
If you haven't already, please provide a URL to the site it came from (or the name of the source if it didn't come from a website) and the name of the person or organisation that owns the copyright.
You next need to add a copyright tag so that other users know how the image may be used. Please browse the list of image copyright tags and determine which applies to the image. If, after browsing this page, you are unsure of the tag to add, please add a {{Don't know}} tag to the image description and someone will help you choose the correct tag.

Please note that if you do not choose a copyright tag for the image within seven days, it will be deleted. Please could you ensure that any other images you have uploaded also have the above information in the description - you can see a list of the images you've uploaded by clicking on My Contributions and selecting Image from the drop-down box. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on my talk page. Thanks! --David Johnson [T|C] 01:52, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chance Phelps

I have no reason to doubt that he was promoted to LCPL, its just that we have so many sources that list him as a PFC (such as this [1]), that we would need something solid to push back with if it is questioned. I'm sure you understand the importance of getting this right. I'm inclined to trust you and there are enough minor references discovered with Google that it should be OK (and I'll leave it in the article this time), but if you can find a definitive reliable source anywhere, that would make it a slam dunk. Thanks - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 22:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:IMG 05951.JPG

Image:IMG 05951.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Satyr statue affixed to Cathedral of St Vincent Switzerland.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Satyr statue affixed to Cathedral of St Vincent Switzerland.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phelps's awards

Well, I would say first to start off by reading Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Verifiability (the second of which is probably the most relavant here). I think I was mistaken in mentioning a record, because to be considered a reliable source, it must be publicly available to any reader who might question the accuracy of a source (explained another way, citing a reference that nobody can find is generally discouraged, and not really acceptable unless it's in addition to other confirming sources). I'm afraid that this letter does not really qualify as verifiable unless it is published somewhere (I will note that while it says that self-published sources aren't normally preferred, I think it is the best and only reference we might get in this matter).
That said, I will note again that I think it is most likely he does have the good conduct medal, but policy is clear on this matter. It's one of the strange things about wikipedia that being able to verify information is more important than it actually being true.
I will note that http://www.run4chance.com/chance.html would make an acceptable source (I know some less than empathic editors who would claim a conflict of interest here, but we will let them alone for now) except for one little dang detail: the caption doesn't match the image! If you can get that fixed, all will be well. I'm also curious, why did the family even request to have the GWOTE converted into an ICM? Seems a bit odd to me, but I can't say that I'm even close to being able to guess the "why" behind that. bahamut0013^words _deeds 19:28, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by pride except as an insinuatioon that I am actively trying to stifle the article that I started. I take great offense if that is what you mean. I have had a hard time remaining objective between my desire to honor an acquantaince of mine and my responsibility to adhere to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I have stated before that there has been an attempt to delete the article; and I intend not to give anyone an excuse to do so again. This means that I absolutely will not tolerate anything in his biography that violates policy; because the existance of such a violation would be all the excuse the deletionists need to delete the whole thing. You are also mistaken about a changing stance; perhaps you did not understand what I said adequetly, so let me be equally blunt: I believe it is likely he was indeed awarded the medal, but without a reference, I cannot let my personal belief into the article, and must treat it as if I believe he was not.

Have you read the links I provided? I am bound by the fact that on Wikipedia, it doesn't matter what you know to be true, it matters what you can prove to be true. Do not presume to accuse me in the future of being difficult for being bound by the rules just as you are in this community. I have poured much effort and time in writing the article, and while I cannot claim ownership, I do find it offensive when someone comes to insult me and denigrate my efforts. bahamut0013^words _deeds 05:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]