User talk:Rorimwema

August 2019

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Johnson Muthama have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Materialscientist (talk) 08:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rorimwema

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Rorimwema, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://amazingkenyaretreat.co.ke/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. creffett (talk) 00:09, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Rorimwema. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 00:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 00:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Rorimwema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There must be a misunderstanding. I am trying to contribute to people who are not on wikipedia and I think they qualify. Rorimwema (talk) 06:40, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=There must be a misunderstanding. I am trying to contribute to people who are not on wikipedia and I think they qualify. [[User:Rorimwema|Rorimwema]] ([[User talk:Rorimwema#top|talk]]) 06:40, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=There must be a misunderstanding. I am trying to contribute to people who are not on wikipedia and I think they qualify. [[User:Rorimwema|Rorimwema]] ([[User talk:Rorimwema#top|talk]]) 06:40, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=There must be a misunderstanding. I am trying to contribute to people who are not on wikipedia and I think they qualify. [[User:Rorimwema|Rorimwema]] ([[User talk:Rorimwema#top|talk]]) 06:40, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

If this is a misunderstanding, why did you wait 5 years to request unblock? You seemed to be promoting a Nigerian senator at the time. What is/was your connection with him? 331dot (talk) 09:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerian senator! I am In Kenya, I was not promoting anyone. It was a political season in our country and I tried to political profiles of politician so that people would get facts, I was new by then. I took a break to learn wikipedia and master it well. I have no interest in promoting something or anyone.

Hi there! You were blocked in 2019 due to promotional edits. One of Wikipedia's foundational pillars is that it provides a neutral point of view. Further, for articles to be added to the encyclopedia, the person must meet Wikipedia's notability standards. In a reply to this message, can you describe in your own words what it means to write from a neutral point of view, as well as how to establish notability? Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:44, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think writing from a neutral point of view means that the article should reflect an independent perspective without focusing to publish a praising or tarnishing publication. It should be fair and present information based on research from notable references and sources. Notability implies that what you publish must be supported by objective evidence or have attracted attention over a period of time based on its significance or value. Rorimwema (talk) 15:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade and 331dot: I guess this is OK. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Rorimwema: You've not answered 331dot's question. The unblock discussion hinges on that answer. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerian senator! I am In Kenya, I was not promoting anyone. It was a political season in our country and I tried to political profiles of politician so that people would get facts, I was new by then. I took a break to learn wikipedia and master it well. I have no interest in promoting something or anyone. Rorimwema (talk) 10:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote here and elsewhere that it was the Senator's autobiography- so you didn't have access to him? 331dot (talk) 10:32, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]