Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! satusuro08:38, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This seems to be a cut and paste mess of a press release or something.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marius Webb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Ronsman!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter(talk)/(contrib)04:53, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your message. I didn't make those edits, another person authorised by me did. That person will be making future edits to the article before it is submitted for publication. Is there a particular procedure for this? I looked through the documentation but couldn't find information on that. My understanding was that multiple people being able to edit articles was part of the setup. 2001:8003:3B41:9500:20D7:40E3:C6EB:7295 (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying. Them doing all the editing would be one solution; another would just be to conduct any communication about the draft on Wikipedia (perhaps on the draft's talk page, Draft talk:Marius Webb). Whatever works for you. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]