User talk:Ronnieradkerockgod

December 2020

Hello, I'm Carbrera. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Big Time Rush discography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Carbrera (talk) 18:11, 14 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Lmao you said the same thing last time. I gave you the source but I didn’t get an answer back Ronnieradkerockgod (talk) 05:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnieradkerockgod, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ronnieradkerockgod! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Big Time Movie Soundtrack, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carbrera (talk) 05:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Please take a second and look to see why your edits are being reverted. None of your sources back up what you're claiming and your edits appear to be totally non-constructive. Carbrera (talk) 05:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Let me ask you something, when did I ask? Ronnieradkerockgod (talk) 05:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 07:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ronnieradkerockgod (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

newreason:After reading the “guide to appealing blocks”, i have decided to make a new one. So please read this one instead of the other one. I have been blocked indefinietly for “distruptive” behaviour on wikipedia. I would like to start off saying i wasnt trying to be distruptive. I was doing my best to adding information on wikipedia. I understand if you needed me to add sources to the page and i should have done that but blocking my indefinitely for that minor mistake is unfair. I believe you should tell me to add sources instead of blocking my account indefinitely. Secondly, if you wanted to penalize me then you should have blocked my account from editing for 1 day instead of indefinietly. I feel like if a user makes a minor mistake unintentionally, a one day block would be fair. I think it would make a user mad if they got blocked for making a minor mistake indefinitely. Thats just my opinion. So please take the time to hopefully unblock my account or maybe shorten the block. I promise thus won’t ever happen again but i do make mistakes like this again, please let me know instead of blocking me indefinitely. Thank you Ronnieradkerockgod (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Block durations are proportional to the need to end disruption; your persistent disruption was not affected by the warnings on this page even though you responded to the warnings. Unsourced or poorly sourced edits is not a minor problem. You also do not address the suspected sockpuppetry. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given your suspected sockpuppetry, I see no reason to change the duration of your block. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]