User talk:Ronin6401

Welcome

Hello Ronin6401! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Levine2112 ^discuss 01:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Plots

I've reverted your edits for several reasons. First, information on Wikipedia needs to be succinct; in other words, summarize to the best of your ability and try not to be overly wordy with sentences. Your edits are doing nothing but saying the same thing that is already there, but with 3 times as many words than is necessary. Second, the bit about "the film ends with a ripple..." is completely unnecessary and has nothing to do with the plot of the film. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop introducing your own POV wording to the Nightmare and Friday articles. This "deceptively calm surface" is entirely POV, and not even relevant. Secondly, contractions are a no-no, so please stop placing them back in. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another no-no is adding dramatic tone to the article. Wikipedia is neutral and film articles, no article for that matter, are not here for you to hone your script writing skills. Please refrain from adding your personal interpretations of scenes, or dramatic touches to the tone of the scene. Secondly, the plot section should reflect what happens in the film, NOT what the director intended to convey. That is why we have the other sections in the production area, to explain what the director wanted. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have already explained this to you. If you continue to persist in your actions to add POV wording, inappropriate writing style, and original research, then I will be forced to ask an Administrator to step in and moderate the matter. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please also be aware of the three revert rule, which states that you cannot revert on a single page more than 3 times in a 24 hour period, unless you are reverting vandalism. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Friday the 13th (film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You should discuss your changes on either the article's talk page or on your talk page if people bring up the issue there, instead of reverting. MASEM 23:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]