User talk:Ron951

Have made edits to Sherwood College nainital article, would appreciate if the history section is made into a separate article. The history article will suffice alone as an article . The history is very detailed and would be making further changes into it. I'm not all coding savy so please before reverting something read and discuss here...Thanks

This discussion should occur on the article's talk page, not your own, so that others may participate. I'm going to restore the text until the discussion concludes. Do not remove it until then. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 06:52, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my fault. I'll make the discussion on article talk page

Please don't remove tags

Since the History of Sherwood College article was redirected back to the main article, it's a moot point, but the edit you made here violates Wikipedia policy of removing tags before their issues are addressed. Adding one sentence is not considered enough to warrant removing the {{no lead}} tag; removing the {{neutrality}} tag just because you didn't like it is not acceptable; and removing the {{no refs}} tag when you didn't even add references is grounds for disciplinary action. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I splited the article because I wanted to add more content. I agree tags should have not been removed so early, however, adding tags for lead was not understood, when the article was a split for the original source, and then what lead dose one may have to provide? . You had main edits (thanks for it) however, before, I could add the reference, the article was redirected. I undid redirection but again user with IP 69.181.249.92 redirected to the main. I could not go on this, so temporarily kept the content on the page and made it as collapsible section. Once I have more time to upload content with due reference I'll do it again. Ron951 (talk) 15:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]