Jump to content

User talk:Romsteadogelthorpe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Romsteadogelthorpe! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 02:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

February 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Dyadic_developmental_psychotherapy (matching the regex rule \bwikia\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Romsteadogelthorpe (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't see why you would state that I have multiple accounts. This is my only account and I've not vandalized any pages...if I've edited improperly I don't see how. I know Fainites seems to not like my edits, but if that means what I did was vandalism because he disagrees with me, I am sorry and am willing to discuss the suggestions I made, or just not have them included. I'd not realized that user Fainites was the owner of the page I edited and that I should not dispute Fainites edites. I won't change Fainites edits again, if that is the rule here...I just did not know that was the case.

Decline reason:

According to a checkuser, you are also operating the account EmmaLangston. Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 04:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Looking at this as a checkuser, I am curious why this account and EmmaLangston (talk · contribs) appear to be operated by the same person. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
They are all the DPeterson entity who was first banned for a year and then inefinitely banned following the Attachment therapy arbitration and this. Fainites barleyscribs 13:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]