User talk:Romaioi/Archive 4

Original Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Romaioi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

I'm answering your reply here:

Thank you for your contributions to Roman Empire, that article truly needs additional references. And, yes, some of the references in there do need to be fixed. The proper way of using references on Wikipedia is described here. It might look overwhelming, but once you get used to those templates they actually make editing easier and the articles more reliable. Drop a note on my talk page if you need any help.

I don't claim to know a lot about the Roman civilisation (though I did study their architecture for a few years), but I do agree the traditional description of the Romans is simplistic (as is the traditional description of Ancient Greek civilisation).

Regarding your user name, you are free to choose virtually any name you want. The recommendation to remain anonymous is mostly a concern for your own privacy. If you want to, you can describe yourself on your user page, but that's up to you.

Again, let me know if I can help you in any way

/ Raven in Orbit (t | c) 15:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Raven. Sorry for the inconsitencies in my referencing. I was not intending to go into the "detail" that I did as I knew I would need my books to refer to - most of the ones I need are in storage. Its a shame about the simplicity seeing that it is based on scholarship that is now over a hundred years old. So much has been learned since then yet much of the literature available to the public continues to paint the old picture. The manner in which the other cultures are generally neglected adds to the dissappointment. On the whole though, that Roman empire article is quite goood. In fact I have been rather impressed with the degree of detail, and scope of coverage in Wikipedia in general. It is proving quite a success.

Thanks also for the offers of assistance and the tip on the tilda's. I read about them but didn't catch on until your reply.

I hope to be able to contribute more soon.

Best wishes,

Romaioi (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cite template

Fixed your ref problem at aluminium oxide by avoiding the cite template. See Wikipedia:Citation templates for usage - specifically Template:Cite paper. Vsmith (talk) 12:07, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Vsmith. Much appreciated. Romaioi (talk)

Shannara

Hi! I've seen you editing Shannara related articles here on Wikipedia, and so I would like to invite you to join the Shannara task force, an effort by Wikipedians to improve the series' coverage on this encyclopedia. Please consider signing up here and helping us out. Thank you in advance!

^-talk- the_ed17 ^-contribs- 17:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. I think will. Though I have only read the Genesis trilogy. I'm not great at plots etc, history, science and economics are more my strength, but I'll help where I can. Romaioi (talk) 02:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else to help! Yay! If you have a question or anything, feel free to leave me a message. I've only read up to Armageddon's Children (Not the Word and Void series either... And, if nothing else, you have to read the The Elfstones of Shannara—it's Brooks' best novel!!!

For an example of a good Shannara article (actually, the only one...), see The Sword of Shannara. ^-talk- the_ed17 ^-contribs- 03:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subheadings

Also, try to remember to use subheadings in those plot summaries, like the one this message is under. Cheers! ^-talk- the_ed17 ^-contribs- 03:31, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can you improve this section? I don't know much about these demons, having not read most of those prequel novels... Thanks, ^-talk- the_ed17 ^-contribs- 04:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll have a go. Please don't think I have given up if you don't see an entry from me for a while. I typically don't always log in frequently and can sometimes only contribute in spurts - life is gets busier with time. But I'll keep at it. P.S. I like your quite at the top of your user page. Very relevant. Romaioi (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Thanks for helping! Cheers, ^-talk- the_ed17 ^-contribs- 17:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I like my quote too. =D I truly believe it, to--see this! If you ever have a question, feel free too ask. Cheers! ^-talk- the_ed17 ^-contribs- 17:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you have seen what I have been going through. Thanks for your comments there. Romaioi (talk) 15:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did...and you're welcome. ^-talk- the_ed17 ^-contribs- 21:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Novels WikiProject

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WikiProject_Novels_announcements}} there.
While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Outreach/User WPNOVELS}}.
The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but other methods are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! – Liveste (talk • edits) 02:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Milhist!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, article logistics, and other tasks.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts and copy-editing alerts.
The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 11:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - October 2008

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External linking

I can't any advantage in linking the sites you included at Perth, Western Australia, so I reverted your edit. This action is, I contend, in accord with guidelines at WP:External links. If you disagree after reading that link, please explain how they can be viewed as prescribed links 'and not those which are proscribed. They would seem to only be portals to commercial sites, and do not give the reader any additional or encyclopaedic information. cygnis insignis 15:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problems - your explanation in the edit summary would have sufficed. Romaioi (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then please pardon my hammering the point. One never knows what guidelines are known to other editors, I thought it reasonable to suppose you were unaware of these. It is a common error among newer users, thus my rv w/ AGF disclaimer. Regards, cygnis insignis 15:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get me wrong. What you said was absolutely fine. I was just pointing out that your explanation in the edit summary was good enough for me.Romaioi (talk) 12:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your courtesy. Well met and all that. cygnis insignis 17:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to be consistent, then you should delete the tourism beureau link on the Western Australia page. I added the tourism link to the Perth article after seeing that. Romaioi (talk) 15:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed it now. cygnis insignis 16:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Different set of rules for different users

Hi, Romaioi. I have read your talkpage and I see that you have suffered a very sad experience, similar to the one that has banned me and others. I am user:Marygiove and I totally agree with you about what you write in your "special archive". At least you can console yourself thinking that you now are not banned, while others like me have no such a "luck". My only crime? To live in the metropolitan area of Miami (nearly 3 million people!) and so my IP is similar to the one of other italian users banned from wikipedia and who live here, like user:Brunodam and user:Cherso. Anyway, as you wrote in your "MFD Link", it is clear that Jimbo's rules are not followed and that there are "different set of rules for different users", specially if there are nationalistic groups (like some Croats who hate Italians) that pressure some admins to accept ONLY their POV on issues about the croatian Dalmatia. I don't know if you are able to read italian, but may be you would be interested in accessing this website ( brunodam.blog.kataweb.it/2008/10/18/altri-commenti-sul-diniego-dellasilo-di-zara/), where some italians name you as an example of what is "rotten" in the english wikipedia about impartiality of some admins dealing with italians and croats.

BTW, do you know that all the mess you have gone trough was started by one of the group of the nationalistic yugoslavians, named user:AlasdairGreen27? He promoted the ban (with another of the group named Direktor) of an article about the "Italian mare nostrum" written by Brunodam, and when you copied some sections of it in another article he believed you were Brunodam (or GiovanniGiove or Pio). In the section "It is Bruno " you can easily read that Noclador is convinced by this Alasdair that Brunodam is Romiaoi and/or others (http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AlasdairGreen27&diff=prev&oldid=230773625#It.27s_Bruno_:-.29). In other words, the astute Alasdair throwed the stone and then waited for Noclador to do all the fighting for him! This trick has been done by the croat group even other times with other persons: it is a trick used many times by the Tito propaganda agents and modelled from the Stalin KGB. And it seems to work well, seeing the fight that has happened between you and Noclador. Sincerely. Marygiove. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.153.154.200 (talk) 21:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know.....just when Romaioi get away from all things involving sockpuppetry, you come along.... How about you create a new account and just stay away from anything resembling the article/topic that got you blocked/identified/accused as a sockpuppet? Then no one will know that you have another account who is a blocked user... As long as you are not banned, I think that a constructive contributor will not get booted, no matter what happened with their previous account (all of this is not assuming that you are a sockpuppet, by the way...). —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 21:58, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a suggestion but you might want to file a check user request if someone is trying to get you involved in sockpuppetry. Welcome back. Justin talk 15:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just gotten back on line to find that this issue keeps following me.

I appreciate the gist of what you are saying concerning the partisan positions in some articles. I see it all the time. Frankly, I do not see why it has to be, nor do I have any respect for those who adopt partisan positions and provide no factual basis for it. From my point of view, history is just that, history. Its purpose is to serve as an OBJECTIVE record of events, with the view to help all societies learn from our past mistakes. From the perspective of documenting, it does not matter who did what to whom. All that matters is that we get the story right and that we learn. (I am highly skeptical that society will learn anyway.) For my part, I predominantly only contribute information that can be supported with a verifiable citation. And where I am sure of information but cannot find the citation I will state that a citation is needed (or I won't add it, it depends). This is what Wikipedia asks us to do as contributors.......yet I see so many occurrances where this is not followed.

I assume, based on what you refer too, your pet subject is that of the Italian people’s historical legacy in the eastern Adriatic, and how they are "victimized". I am well aware that Italians have been "victims" over the past view centuries in the region. HOWEVER, so have the people of the other cultures in the region. More often than not, they were not so much victims of the adjacent people, but more so the authorities of all the respective regimes. Of all the regimes, the Italians (namely the fascists), were not on the scene with any major authority for any great length of time. But, irrespective of their intentions, they were not innocent in the negative effect they had on the civilians of the region (and they ultimately did more damage to their own people). It was more a case of being victims of the social forces of the times, and such events are not isolated to the region in question. In my opinion, you and the user’s you “hate” have no reason to be at loggerheads on the issue – you probably have more in common that you realize.

As to AlasdairGreen27...I do not know the full history between you…..but, in my case he apologized for getting it wrong (when he did not have to – as he had little to do with my case). So I do not agree with your perspective on AlasdairGreen27. In my case the person who treated me with the utmost contempt, underhanded dishonesty and disrespect happens to be an Italian!! ....But one idiot does not influence me to ill-judge the rest.

And I must ask, why do you think I would be so naive as to act on your accusations against others with no substantiatable proof? We have accusations of sockpuppetry in common, but when I was being slandered and martyred, none of the supposed "socks" spoke out to clarify on my behalf, but instead, made things worse for me.

With all due respect, your wording (or shall I say, story line) sounds similar to that of Brunodam’s (here). I am not saying that you and he are the same, but there are similarities.... If you are not a sock (I am assuming you are not), you can take it to higher authorities to have your case heard. Otherwise, The Ed gave a good suggestion.

The only thing I can agree on, at this stage, is that the policing has been too fierce and not properly researched. And I believe it would be more effective if it was more constructive. Sincerely, Romaioi (talk) 05:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romaioi! You're back! How's life been treating you? —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 21:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The_Ed17. I am good, thank you. Very busy though. Just got through the bulk of moving house...till plenty to do there....what a mission when you try to fit that in with everything else. Hows things? For a second I thought that message on your page about you being up for deletion was serious.....I was ready to start batting for you. Romaioi (talk) 08:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. Moving? I had to do a down-sized version of that when I came here to college...but that was nothing like what you are doing now... =/

Things are ok. A little wiki-burned out, but I can't complain too much. :) No, I'm not up for actual deletion, it's just La Pianista deciding to be ~~dumb~~ funny. :D :D :D :D So what did I do in retaliation? I nominated HER! =) —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for
Ed} 15:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer, Romaioi. Of course I did not want to push you to act against AlasdairGreen27: it is easy to understand such a naive possibility, don't you agree? I only wanted to show you that you were right when you stated that in wikipedia there are "different set of rules for different users" as you wrote, and that -if you think well about- even Noclador was pushed against you with the same tricky behaviour by this group of Slovenians and Croats. And this has happened with others forumers (see in the same example you did to me here). I wish you a wonderful experience with wikipedia, something that I will not be allowed to do (even if I have tried to contact "higher authorities to have my case heard"). One last commentary (of course, I will not contact you anymore): I am not Brunodam or Cherso even if we live in the same metropolitan area of Florida: we Italians write in similar way in english, especially if we have the same level of studies ( I mean:graduated) and come from the same area of Italy. Sincerely. Marygiove

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - November 2008

This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 05:28, 3 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Romaioi. You have new messages at The ed17's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

If you are watching my page, just tell me and I'll stop leaving these. :) Also, you don't have to comment them out with  tags if you don't want—you can just remove them! Cheers, —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 17:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind either way mate. But yes, I checked your page. I was hoping you would surprise them all in the presidential race. ;-)Romaioi (talk) 13:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I got zero votes - a bona-fide perennial candidate! :D —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 19:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Mary

Hi Romaioi, thanks for your note. I wasn't aware of the thread on your talkpage. User:Marygiove is Bruno wearing a rather flimsy costume. See [1] and then Special:Contributions/4.231.207.47 and Special:Contributions/4.231.207.226. Thanks again ;-) AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 14:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merging

I've replied over at User talk:EdJohnston#Page merge. EdJohnston (talk) 05:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Language

By removing it. 3rdAlcove (talk) 08:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

Thanx buddy, welcome to the club :) Zenanarh (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Romaioi. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Article Rescue Members are not necessarily inclusionists, all wikipedians are warmly welcome to join.~~~~

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - March 2009

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Novels Newsletter - June 2009

WikiProject Novels - Coordinator Election

Hello. To begin, every member of WikiProject Novels will be getting this message (the joy of macros) so if you wish to get in touch with me, please post a message on my talk page. I would encourage anyone who so wishes, to stand in the Coordinator Elections. If you wish to stand, please do so by 23:59pm, June 27. Voting will the continue to 23:59pm, July 21. Can everyone please check-out the Coordinator Elections page. Also, the collaboration of the month is The Tin Drum, so if you have any spare time, please check it out. And I apologise to the seven of you for whom this will be a repeat message. Regards, Alan16 (talk).

Coordinator Election

Hello. The Coordiantor Election has begun. All members are encouraged to vote by the deadline, July 28. To vote simply add support to the comments and questions for.. section of the member of your choice.

3 users are standing:

Regards, Alan16 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - July 2009

The July 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16(talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Novels - Narnia Task Force

Hi! You would be glad to know that a new wikipedia ad has been created by Srinivas to encourage users to join Chronicles of Narnia Task Force. You can display that ad on your user/talk page too using the following code: {{Wikipedia ads|ad=190}}


Wikipedia ads	file info – #190

-- Alan16 (talk) 10:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Novels - August 2009 Newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16 (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators, Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]