User talk:Rollpaperp

June 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 09:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

I am here to build an encyclopedia that you are vandalizing. Go away! Foreign election interference! Rollpaperp (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

May I please suggest that the next reviewing administrator would revoke the talk page access? Ymblanter (talk) 11:10, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rollpaperp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ymblanter blocked me vindictively in retaliation for reporting Ymblanter of vandalism. The vandalism Ymblanter committed is removing Edward Davida from the general election he is in. There is no legitimate reason to block meRollpaperp (talk) 09:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your edit was clearly and obviously inappropriate and was correctly reverted by multiple editors. Yamla (talk) 10:30, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My edit is appropriate. Edward Davida is a candidate in this general election. Multiple editors were wrong. If multiple people say 2+2=5, that does not change the fact that 2+2=4

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rollpaperp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My edit is appropriate. Edward Davida is a candidate in this general election. Multiple editors were wrong. If multiple people say 2+2=5, that does not change the fact that 2+2=4 Rollpaperp (talk) 10:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC) Unblock me at once. BLOCK Ymblanter for harassment/vandalism/foreign election interference. My edit is appropriate. Edward Davida is a candidate in this general election. Multiple editors were wrong. If multiple people say 2+2=5, that does not change the fact that 2+2=4 Rollpaperp (talk) 10:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool indicates that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 12:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rollpaperp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not abused any accounts. I did create a 2nd account because Ymblanter blocked me so he can continue to vandalize a page I edited. I have no problem using only 1 account. BLOCK Ymblanter for harassment/vandalism/foreign election interference. My edit is appropriate. Edward Davida is a candidate in this general election. Ymblanter was wrong to remove this FACT. Rollpaperp (talk) 12:15, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Even without the checkuser tool it is clear to me that you did. What you describe is the definition of abuse of accounts. Please read my comments below. 331dot (talk) 12:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• (ec) Somebody beat me to it but I want to post my reason anyway. I think the confusion here is that Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state, and no such sources have been offered that Mr. Davida is a candidate. Documents from the Arizona Secretary of State are a primary source. Anyone can turn in papers to be a write-in candidate. Mr. Davida is a write-in candidate and is not on the Republican primary ballot. If he receives sufficient coverage in independent reliable sources about his write-in candidacy, he can be mentioned. Otherwise no. In any event, you seem to be here to advocate for Mr. Davida and not collaborate with others to determine the content of the article. You edit warred and possibly socked to preserve your edits. This is unacceptable, and I must come to the conclusion that the reason for the block is correct. If you are here to build an encyclopedia, please tell us how you will do that and how your behavior will change going forward. If you are connected to Mr. Davida, please tell us how.
• I was tempted to summarily decline this due to your "foreign election interference" comment. Wikipedia is a global project with editors from all over the world. Any editor may edit any article in good faith. If you use this page to attack other users again, your access to it will be removed. 331dot (talk) 12:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rollpaperp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Documents from the Arizona Secretary of State ARE reliable. The box where I am adding Edward Davida is pertaining to the general election, which differs from the primary. "Foreign election interference" is not an attack -- it describes Ymblanter trying to cancel Davida from Denmark -- a foreign country. Once again there is nothing wrong with my behavior -- I am fine using only one account without socking. Ymblanter is stalking my edits in retaliation for reporting him of vandalism by removing Davida from the general election he is obviously in.

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you are continuing your attacks despite my warning in your malformed request above, I am removing access. 331dot (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 331dot (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

If I move to Arizona and drop off my write in candidacy papers, I hope you fight as hard for me as you are for Mr. Davida. Again, anyone can do that. We need coverage that discusses it. 331dot (talk) 12:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

UTRS

• UTRS appeal #59375 is now closed summarily for a personal attack. 331dot (talk) 12:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #59887

is closed. Strike two! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

"I have not abused any accounts. I did create a 2nd account because Ymblanter blocked me "

Creating a second account to evade a block is abusing multiple accounts. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #61754

is closed. Strike 3. Banned from UTRS. Noting block evasion below. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2022 (UTC)