User talk:Rojocube

Recent edit to Emilio Bonifacio

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Roxy the dog (resonate) 00:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neon Icon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. STATic message me! 07:00, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neon Icon, you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me! 15:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm Spanneraol. Your recent edit to the page Jordan Walden appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The team name is the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim... thats what they refer to themselves by... we dont have to like the name change but we cant arbitrarily change it. Spanneraol (talk) 00:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its not incorrect though. They don't play in LA they play in Anaheim.

December 2014

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Miguel Montero, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was Just announced on mlbn. Some insider from twatter. No details yet but it's a done deal. At the least give me credit when details surface.

Why did you change it back. They just announced it. I am not able to send You a direct message.

"Credit"? What credit is there to get? Wikipedia isn't journalism; we're not trying to "break" a story. That blog piece attributes the signing to another blog piece, which is actually fairly light on the concrete aspects of this. What's the rush anyway? By tonight, it'll be a done deal and that'll be that. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All I want is credit for Jon Lester going to the Cubs that's it. After that I'm done. Thank you. RojoCubeRojocube (talk) 22:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I Just want credit for the Jon Lester signing that all Rojocube (talk) 22:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)RojoCubeRojocube (talk) 22:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Credit is nothing on Wikipedia. If you make such changes, the information has to be widely verifiable, not just something you happen to hear. Content should be based off of being true, not just being fast. Please do not focus on credit, as your efforts to be credited are disruptive, and have gotten you blocked. -- Orduin ^⋠T⋡ 22:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to Miguel Montero, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orduin ^⋠T⋡ 22:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jon Lester. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:36, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're evidencing quite a bit of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. Once Lester shows up here, then it's a done deal. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:58, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Verifiability

Please note that the page Wikipedia:Verifiability is where Wikipedia's site policy is posted, it's not the place to discuss sources for articles.

If you wish to discuss content for a particular article, use the talk page for that article (when viewing an article, there should be a tab labelled either "talk" or "discussion" near the top). In the case of the article for Jon Lester, the talk page can be found at talk:Jon Lester. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:04, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:06, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Jimmy Rollins. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Bagumba (talk) 03:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Designated for assignment

When a player is designated for assignment, the team has ten days to assign him. The Marlins are currently working to trade Jarrod Saltalamacchia, as he is still in the Marlins' org. – Muboshgu (talk) 12:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jeff Samardzija, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:38, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rojocube. You have new messages at Muboshgu's talk page.
Message added 21:14, 8 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

– Muboshgu (talk) 21:14, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jason Heyward. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits to Brendan Ryan

A suggestion I have is to maybe review a baseball team's transaction page online prior to making changes to a player who has reportedly signed or been traded to a new team. As an example, here is the Chicago Cubs' transaction page of deals that have been made official. Cubbie15fan (talk) 17:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]