User talk:RojNews18

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RojNews18 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 19:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 22:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Arbil, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Arbil was changed by RojNews18 (u) (t) deleting 8797 characters on 2010-03-29T00:52:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:52, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 00:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]