User talk:Roicomllc

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catholic Engaged Encounter (October 5)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Catholic Engaged Encounter.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Libby norman (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Roicomllc, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Catholic Engaged Encounter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Catholic Engaged Encounter, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Catholic Engaged Encounter

Hello Roicomllc. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Catholic Engaged Encounter".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Catholic Engaged Encounter}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:River City Chili Cook-Off has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:River City Chili Cook-Off. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Roicomllc

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Roicomllc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Home Lander (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with User:Roicomllc. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 18:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because we are just providing basic information on who manages the user account. It is operated by a small PR firm in Sacramento, CA. There is no blatant promotion of products, services, links to services, etc. It simply states, "ROICOMLLC is operated by Michael Babowal, the president and CEO of ROICOM Consulting, LLC, dba, Interstate PR, a boutique public relations firm in Sacramento, CA." Fact is not promotion. Promotion would be, saying, "ROICOMLLC is operated by Michael Babowal, the president and CEO of ROICOM Consulting, LLC, dba, Interstate PR, one of the top public relations firms in Sacramento, CA. Interstate PR handles all needs of clients, including Wikipedia page creation. More information can be found at www.interstatepr.net."

September 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:02, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Novice User - Got Blocked without ANY HELP

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Roicomllc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

mbabowal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am a user who doesn't use Wikipedia to create or edit often, and trying to do things right; however, instead of getting assistance, all I got was technical responses that made no sense to me and was blocked immediately without an explanation, which I understood, of my errors and suggestions on how to fix those errors. I was trying my best to fix errors, apparently unsuccessfully, and was immediately blocked during my attempts. The two pages that I have tried to create are both for non-profit organizations, which I volunteer my time for. I have never been paid to create a Wikipedia article, nor do I ever plan to be paid to create a Wikipedia article. As such, I am not familiar with Wikipedia's communication system, and it is not intuitive to me, so seeking help has been difficult. I created my account with ROICOMLLC because that is a user name that I tend to use, I was not aware this is a violation. I also use the user name mbabowal often, and am more than happy to switch to that user name. As you can see by my actions or lack thereof, I am not using Wikipedia for promotion of my business. I've been in business for 10 years and have tried to create 2 articles - neither about my business. On my most recent article, draft:River City Chili Cook-Off, I have tried my hardest to fix errors and make changes as quickly as possible when people leave feedback. Please forgive me for not fully understanding what information should be included in the User Page. I respectfully hope that this block, is removed, my user name changed to mbabowal. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Your choice of new username seems acceptable.(note that usernames cannot be that of a business per the username policy) However, you indicated on your user page that your company is a public relations firm. Even if you are volunteering your services in this case, you still must comply with the paid editing policy. Please also review the conflict of interest policy. You aren't going to be unblocked to edit about anything related to your conflict of interest(paid or unpaid). If you want to edit about other subjects for which you have no conflict of interest, please tell what those might be along with your agreement to refrain from conflict of interest edits. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 21:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest Rules

Seriously? I looked at the conflict of interest rules. It merely states that I need to state that I am a connected contributor. I’m happy to do that. I firmly believe you are being highly unreasonable.

Please reconsider. Roicomllc (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merely stating your connection does not give you a license to edit within your conflict of interest. You can make edit requests or use Articles for Creation, but you shouldn't make direct edits. You might (emphasis on might) later be permitted to make indirect edit requests or use Articles for Creation, but only if you want to be a general, individual Wikipedia contributor. If all you want to do is edit within your COI, this is the end of the road for your Wikipedia career. You are free to make a new unblock request to attempt to convince a different administrator to unblock you, if you wish. 331dot (talk) 21:36, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: River City Chili Cook-Off (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Willsome429 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Every section should have at least one source, even if they are re-used sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:River City Chili Cook-Off and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:River City Chili Cook-Off, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:River City Chili Cook-Off concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:River City Chili Cook-Off, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]