User talk:Rohit beatricemodels

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rohit beatricemodels, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 15:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beatrice International models[edit]

Some things I should explain about Wikipedia:

It is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory. So it is quite choosy about subjects for articles. The test for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary).

Notability is not "inherited" from contact with notable persons, so listing notable clients does not establish notability of the agency

I totally agree with your point. Yes wikipedia is not a listing directory but all the major companies/brands have wikipedia pages to bring awareness about themselves. We don't want to treat it like a listing directory but would like to use it for brand awareness, tell the story of how the brand has originated/ shaping. All the other agencies/ business who have similar operations to us, who have got similar media coverage have wiki pages.

The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary). The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary).

Totally agree.. Please go and check the wikipages of those notable people and look for "Beatrice Models". They all had linked their pages to ours, they had mentioned our brand.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Channing_Tatum ( look for Beatrice Model Agency) https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Gabriel_Aubry (He has modeled for Tommy Hilfiger, Gianni Versace, Calvin Klein, DKNY, Valentino, Trussardi, Nautica, Exte, Joop, Massimo Dutti and Next.[3] He is signed to Wilhelmina Models in New York City, and to Beatrice Models in Milan, Italy.[4])

and many more....

It is not up to the owners of a company to decide that it should have an article, or for its former owners to decide that it should not. It was nominated for deletion because the nominator thought it was not notable in Wikipedia's sense, and the users who commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatrice International Models were experienced Wikipedians (all, as it happens, with at least two years' contribution history) doing the tedious but necessary maintenance task of commenting on deletion proposals. These are not "fake profiles". Please read WP:Assume good faith.

-- Agree but I just found it strange that for years the page existed then suddenly in 2 days, 2-3 administrators applied for its deletion. That also when the company was going to change management. That was my concern. But anyhow if you think the administrators are reliable, i would kindly ask you to look into the case again.

Also, the page lacks content. It definitely needs doing up and we are working on putting everything together.

People are strongly discouraged from writing directly about themselves or their own companies. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

If you wish to appeal at WP:Deletion review, you need to claim either that the deletion discussion was not fairly closed, which would hard to justify, or that there exist references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. If you can list some of those, Deletion review may agree to restore the article as a draft for you to work on and submit for review by an uninvolved user.

There is good advice on how to write acceptable articles at WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 15:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]