User talk:Rogwan

Dishwashing liquid

Ever try putting dishwashing liquid that in water that has been contaminated with diesel? No? Then don't delete something which you have ZERO knowledge about.

Your addition was badly written and could do with a source. Rogwan 08:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

If it's 'badly written' why not rewrite it? Why not be helpful instead of deleting something on a subject that you do not know about.

Please discuss this on the Talk page. Rogwan 13:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Fleet Foxes

A tag has been placed on Fleet Foxes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tanthalas39 (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I've read the note you left on the talk page of the Fleet Foxes article and while I understand you feel these claims lend notability, I'll suggest they don't meet the Wikipedia policy outlined at WP:MUSIC that covers musical groups. You might want to look at that policy for guidance. If I can help further with Wikipedia policy, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sun Giant

A tag has been placed on Sun Giant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —BradV 00:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Seventh Generation Inc.

how do you suggest that I make this article(Seventh Generation Inc.) as informative as possible without making it look like an advert? Daniellealexander23 (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Refer to the Talk page. Rogwan (talk) 10:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ecover

I have nominated Ecover, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecover. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC) SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rogwan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. David Read - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Lorna Casselton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lea Valley High School logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lea Valley High School logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)