User talk:Roger Belmar

Michael Fagan incident

Hi! Thinks for your work on the Michael Fagan incident article. However, Wikipedia doesn't normally mention the names of people who are otherwise unknown unless they've been convicted, due to the possible risk of harm to people found to be not guilty. We can cover the events, and mention that a person was charged, but we don't typically mention them by name. - Bilby (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Belmar, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Roger Belmar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Fagan incident may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

YARD'S REPORT ON JULY 9 INTRUSION INTO BUCKINGHAM PALACE" ''The New York Times'' 22 July 1982]]</ref> was a famous [[Buckingham Palace]] intruder who broke into the [[Elizabeth II|Queen]]'s

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:27, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Please consider using the "Preview" function (to avoid lots of minor edits) and more importantly using edit summaries to briefly describe your changes. Also, please avoid overlinking; i.e., if there is already a wikilink to Queen Elizabeth II, you don't need to add links to subsequent mentions. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:47, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Belmar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Belmar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. CombieTractor 18:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]