Jump to content

User talk:RogerBurks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, RogerBurks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Kingturtle 20:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Landrum Bolling

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Landrum Bolling, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mercycorps.org/aboutus/leadership/673, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Landrum Bolling and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Landrum Bolling with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Landrum Bolling.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Landrum Bolling/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Landrum Bolling saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Harryboyles 02:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nancy Lindborg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nancy Lindborg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nancy Lindborg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot 00:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mercy Corps WP:COI

[edit]
Accounts

RogerBurks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
207.189.98.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Registered to MERCYCORPS
67.189.62.168 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) OREGON-11
24.22.82.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) OREGON-10
220.247.212.171 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
24.21.206.200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) OREGON-7
AbHa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Hu12 00:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Mercy Corps

[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mercy Corps, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Hu12 00:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dan O'Neill (Humanitarian), we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mercycorps.org/aboutus/leadership/668. As a copyright violation, Dan O'Neill (Humanitarian) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dan O'Neill (Humanitarian) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- JLaTondre 00:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Mercy Corps

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Hu12 00:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive editing and tagging of the Mercy Corps article seems strange

[edit]

Not sure why this particular administrator - Hu12 - is so intent on reverting valid edits to the Mercy Corps article, including inclusion of outside references that were requested. Please explain.Roger 00:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read above. Unfortunately your conflict of interest editing involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote Mercy Corps . Because your the senior writer for Mercy Corps, Such a conflict is strongly discouraged. Your contributions to wikipedia under RogerBurks and IP 207.189.98.44, consist entirely of promote Mercy Corps. Looking through your contributions as a whole, the all seem to be Mercy Corps related only. Please do not create articles or continue adding links to your own websites to Wikipedia.--Hu12 00:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've been looking at the edits on Mercy Corps and the conversation taking place between you and RogerBurks since it was recently reported at Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism. I must ask that you please not bite the newcomers. RogerBurks appears to be editing in good faith and addressing the concerns regarding NPOV that are mentioned in the pages templates.
Your comments on this user's talk page seem repetitive and appear to be from a template. They do not communicate clearly what issue you have, aside from repeatedly issuing the COI warning. You also add a list of IP addresses here but fail to explain what relevance or meaning they have, possibly confusing the user further. Although the template regarding WP:COI mentions that users should "exercise great caution" when a COI could be interpreted, it does not expressly prohibit it. Therefore, without specific guidance the repeated posting of this template likely serves only to annoy rather than inform or instruct. Indeed it was not until this section that you that you bothered to explain yourself clearly. Again, as you state above, apparent COI is strongly discouraged but not prohibited. I believe that we should judge RogerBurks edits on their face rather than revert them outright (Roger- you need to make sure you add verifiable references that are not primary sources). --Mperry 01:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
RogerBurks is no newcomer, this account has been active since, 3 February 2006, over a year and a half. Perhaps the 254 edits from IP 207.189.98.44(Registered to MERCYCORPS), and the mutitude use of sock accounts and IP's shed some light on the long term nature of the problem that wikipedia faces. For well over a year half the sole purpose of these accounts were to promote Mercy Corps. SeeWikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Mercy_Corps_COI_spam--Hu12 01:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that there are several posts from that IP address is that there are multiple people working for Mercy Corps who contribute to various parts of Wikipedia. It's not just me; I have a user account and usually log in to make changes. If you look at the posts from that IP, you'll see many more contributions than just Mercy Corps. In fact, one of any 150 people who work at Mercy Corps could have made edits or contributions at any given time. This is not part of some sock puppet campaign of self-promotion. Thank you for your comprehension. Roger 03:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is ridiculous - and disagree that, just because I work for an organization, that I am unable to provide an objective voice on Wikipedia. The fact that my contributions have been mostly about Mercy Corps is irrelevant - I am striving to be neutral and just spent time this afternoon making the Mercy Corps article more objective. Why shouldn't subject-matter experts be able to create and edit articles, when efforts are made to stay objective? Seems draconian.

By the way, a colleague just pointed this article out to me: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/I_pod. Not only VERY self-promotional, but actually offers links to go and buy the products. That seems like a much bigger COI than a humanitarian organization trying to have a small presence on Wikipedia. Roger 00:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you have a team in place to promote Mercy Corps on Wikipedia? Conflict of interest is a conflict of interest, they don't come in sizes. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The nature of Wikipedia means that you can't make a convincing argument based on what other articles do or don't have a COI issue. So just pointing out that a another article has a problem, does not excuse your organization. see Neutral point of view, What Wikipedia is not and Spam policy--Hu12 01:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No team. And it does seem odd to have no recourse on this - just what you say. Seems overly authoritarian.. Roger 01:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not webspace provider or a vehicle for promotion. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information. Thanks.--Hu12 01:15, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair enough. As mentioned, though, I have made numerous - and frequent - changes to abide with the rules here. A question: what do I need to do to get the COI tag removed from the article? It's very distracting, and I don't think we should have to live with it indefinitely. Thanks in advance for your advice on this. Roger 03:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfotunatly the tag needs to stay as its a factual. I tried another version of the tag, however this one is better. You are the largest contributor with 96 total since your first edit back on 02/03/2006. You company IP comes in at second with 14 since first edit on 11/16/2004. I'm third with 6 edits. --Hu12 04:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand that. But there must be some kind of solution to eventually get this tag removed. What is one suggestion? Thanks for your help on this. Roger 04:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, once again: what can we all do (as Wikipedians) to get the COI tag removed from the Mercy Corps page? It shouldn't have to be up there for perpetuity, right? And there have been numerous edits by folks other than me over the last few days. Again, thanks in advance for your help. Roger 20:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:DanandElls.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:DanandElls.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.35.251 (talk) 01:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Logo2 thumb.gif

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Logo2 thumb.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 12:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:TsunamiCass.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TsunamiCass.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RogerBurks&oldid=1060767204"