User talk:Roelle Dimalanta

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Otacon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Otacon was changed by Roelle Dimalanta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853136 on 2020-09-16T20:28:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jacob Gotts. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Otacon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. { $\mathbb {JPG}$ } 06:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Otacon, you may be blocked from editing. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Otacon. Galebazz (talk) 11:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Otacon. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to make this more clear: you are risking your account being blocked. Please stop making the same nonconstructive changes to this article. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 22:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Otacon. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding the same nonsensical edit to Otacon. It will continue to be removed, by myself or other editors, unless its issues are addressed.

Among other problems, your changes, all unexplained and unsourced, drastically change the meaning of sentences (changing "death" to "survival"), and contain a vast number of errors. You cannot expect others to do this sort of cleanup work for you. At the very least, run your contributions through a spellcheck. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Roelle Dimalanta. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Otacon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Isaidnoway (talk) 08:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request at Otacon

Your edit summary - An editor without a conflict of interest will consider it and act accordingly. I don't have a conflict of interest and have considered it, and acted accordingly, your addition has been rejected. Make your proposals for changes and/or addition of content on the talk page. Use Template:Request edit, be specific about the changes you want to make and provide reliable sources to support the content you want to change. You must also disclose your conflict of interest on the talk page as well. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 14:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC) Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).[reply]

October 2020

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jumpytoo Talk 22:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Otacon, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Roelle_Dimalanta reported by User:Jumpytoo (Result: ). Thank you. Jumpytoo Talk 03:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Otacon. Isaidnoway (talk) 10:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Otacon. jp×g 03:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Otacon for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Otacon for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Why aren't you responding to any of these messages on your talk page? If you continue to disruptively edit Otacon, I'm pretty sure you will end up having your account blocked. Please stop. Isaidnoway (talk) 18:31, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this is a person who can currently be reasoned with to not constantly vandalise the Otacon article. At the very least they don't seem to care about retaining their editing privileges. They've now had about ten warnings about stopping their vandalism under threat of being banned and have shown no signs of trying to do so. I'm not a very active editor nor can I say that I have much knowledge about the circumstances that should constitute a permanent ban but I don't think this person is going to stop their constant fanfiction-esque vandalism until they are prevented from doing so. Lewcario (talk) 15:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Special ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.

Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please contact the election coordinators for assistance. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]