Jump to content

User talk:RockSolidCosmo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, RockSolidCosmo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - 2/0 (cont.) 16:34, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do we know that Eddington was the translator of Lemaitre (1927)?

[edit]

hi RockSolidCosmo. In this edit of the Hubble's law article, you wrote that the 1931 MNRAS translation of Lemaitre's 1927 article in French was done by Eddington. Sidney van den Bergh arXiv:1106.1195 is not aware of the translator, he wrote that the MNRAS present-day editor could not find records of who did the translation, and David Block arXiv:1106.3928 does not seem to be aware of who the translator is. Given that the translator (or else maybe the editor in 1931) of MNRAS seems to have deliberately hidden the fact that Lemaitre estimated H_0 = 625 km/s/Mpc in 1927 - two years before Hubble, though using essentially the same data (distance moduli from Hubble) (see van den Bergh 2011 and Block 2011) - it's an especially important historical question.

Do you have any source for who the translator was, or did you just make an educated guess? We can switch this discussion over to Talk:Hubble's law whenever you wish. Boud (talk) 07:48, 30 June 2011 (UTC) (minor clarification Boud (talk) 07:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Dear Boud, thanks for your comment. After checking some notes, I don't have source regarding the translator. I'll edit the biblio section of the Hubble's law article. Cheers, RockSolidCosmo (talk) 09:16, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sidney van den Bergh has a newer article on the subject. arXiv:1108.0709 Roger (talk) 06:12, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]