User talk:Roc999

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Sneed, you will be blocked from editing. --Mhking 03:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Sun-Times

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chicago Sun-Times. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Even if your contributions were properly sourced, they are not appropriate for the main article on the Chicago Sun-Times. Dppowell 04:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Jahnke

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Martin Jahnke, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Single-issue notability at best, no references provided.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Vianello (talk) 21:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Martin Jahnke

An article that you have been involved in editing, Martin Jahnke, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Jahnke. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 12:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]