User talk:Robertsloca

Re: Steroid Ranking Charts

I honestly do appreciate your efforts to contribute, but copying text from other pages can get Wikipedia itself into legal trouble (especially from copyrighted pages, and most/all pages are copyrighted). Feel free to engage in fair use of other websites, though -- use parts of them as references, paraphrasing some sections into your own words without lifting out the page's whole content, and then cite the pages appropriately. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Luna Santin 10:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for any offense, I intended none. I will ask, though, that you try to understand where I've reached my own conclusions. When a lengthy table like that appears on Wikipedia, obviously very deeply researched information, and there's no reference or citation provided, the table was very obviously copied from somewhere else, and probably without asking permission. Copyright law is a bit complicated, but one of the cruxes is that directly copy-pasting large sections of content from one website to another is almost invariably a violation, either of the website's rights, or of the copyright inherently granted to the original author. I did find one website which offered that table ([1]), but didn't locate any others; feel free to give me links if you'd like to bolster your case. My current belief is that someone put a great deal of time and effort into that table, and probably didn't intend for it to be freely copied. At the absolute minimum, a citation is very much required, out of respect for the original author's work. I see that you've made contributions in the past; I respect that, and I'd like to personally thank you for the time you've taken to help the project. At the same time, I feel that at least a few of my concerns are valid. Thanks again. Regards, Luna Santin 04:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding those Unreal Tournament images you mentioned, I have no connection with those discussions or deletions, but the impression I get from your talk page is that you uploaded them without providing any copyright or licensing information. Quite probably screenshots will qualify as fair use, and you can find more information at Wikipedia:Image copyrights, and especially at the fair use templates section. Images without verifiable copyright are deleted, after a short period; it's up to an image uploader to tell the community if an image is fair use. It's a bit tricky to work with it all, I know. Happy to answer any questions you have. Luna Santin 04:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's two issues you're bringing up, here. First, is the table you uploaded a copyright violation? It's a bit difficult to tell. One thing I notice: the various websites you've linked are displaying different versions of that table, implying that they're either using different sources or creating the tables on their own, using their own research, and likewise implying that there's a certain degree of opinion involved (see WP:NPOV, another concern). Like I said before, my impression is that someone put a good deal of time and effort into these tables; it's not quite the same as listing a team's scores -- that takes a glance at the scoreboard or press release -- and this table is a bit more involved. We don't have permission to directly copy someone else's work; in this case, it's probably more appropriate to link to the websites in question. The second issue: should Wikipedia abide by copyright law? That's neither my nor your decision. Our personal opinions of copyright law have little or no direct effect on the legal framework; sure, the law may need adjustment, but I would strongly oppose any attempt to use Wikipedia as a soapbox for the purpose -- if I want to take a legal risk to make a point, I'll do it, but I won't readily drag someone else, much less an entire online community, into it. I'm sorry you feel unappreciated; given the way you feel, it might be in your interest to find another website or even start your own wiki. Regards, Luna Santin 18:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ut99shockrifle.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ut99shockrifle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leticia-Demuse-Abstract-Artist.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Leticia-Demuse-Abstract-Artist.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gdefy

A tag has been placed on Gdefy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 09:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robertsloca. You have new messages at StephenBuxton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.