User talk:Robert twain

Your draft article, Draft:Nevercrew

Hello, Robert twain. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Nevercrew".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NEVERCREW (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

May be notable but needs more in-depth coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NEVERCREW and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Robert twain, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NEVERCREW (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Considered by whom? Please see WP:PEACOCK.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NEVERCREW and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 09:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NEVERCREW (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Wikipedia cannot be used as a source. Also the large quoted reviews need to be consolidated or made into complete sentences in your own words to sum up what the review says instead of just quoting it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NEVERCREW and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NEVERCREW has been accepted

NEVERCREW, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overciting and conflict of interest

Hello. Please read WP:OVERCITE, which is about why we do not use five sources in a row. Also, are you connected to NEVERCREW in any way, or being paid to edit their page? Your edit history seems to say you are solely interested in their page.ThatMontrealIP (talk)

Hello. Thank you for the change and the message. I didn't think about the WP:OVERCITE limit of 5 sources in a row. I actually want to create pages about artists that are notable but I don't find on wikipedia and I began with NEVERCREW. I have few other things in progress but not yet made drafts, due to lack of time. It already took me months to have this first one working and quite complete. About the WP:OVERCITE again, is it then possible to add books to the list of sources without using them as quotes? Thanks again. Robert twain (talk) 13:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for your contributions. the Nevercrew article is great, it doe snot need much work so I would not worry about that. WP:OVERCITE covers your question about how many sources to use. Basically, everything on Wikipedia has to be sourced, but to do this you only need one to three sources. Anything above that is disruptive to the reader. Putting five sources in a row is never needed. If you really want to use the sources you could put them on another related statement that needs sources. So you are not connected to Nevercrew at all? Thanks.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you again for explaining. No, no connection with Nevercrew. I'm an admirer of street art since years, especially about the european scene. Ok for the WP:OVERCITE, got it. So I don't think is essential to add those new sources forcibly. Thank you! Robert twain (talk) 07:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]