User talk:Robert Kohen
Mark Koltko-Rivera at List of Freemasons
[edit]- Ah... I took that discription from the article on him. I will amend. thanks. Blueboar (talk) 18:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, from the bio article he seems to have a PHD in psychology. So I don't see the discription as being wrong. Blueboar (talk) 18:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- As for using the first line of the bio article... to be honest that comes across as "puffery" (over inflating the importance of the subject)... even if accurate, it is too much for the list of Freemasons. "American phychologist" is enough to identify him (so the reader will say "oh, that Mark Koltko-Rivera"). If people wish to find out more about him they can read the bio article. Blueboar (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- On the issue of NYS law... I am not sure if NYS laws apply to Wikipedia... but, we can resolve this by saying he is an "American Doctor of Psychology and Author" to account for any writings that would not fall under "psychology".
- Actually, from the bio article he seems to have a PHD in psychology. So I don't see the discription as being wrong. Blueboar (talk) 18:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- One other thing... Please stop reverting the article back to the version you prefer... that is known as "edit warring" and is seriously frowned on by Wikipedia (it can even get you blocked from further editing... see WP:3rr). Given that you are a relatively new editor, I will happily cut you some slack... but I suggest you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's core policies and guidelines before you go much further. Not everyone is as understanding and forgiving as I am. :>) Blueboar (talk) 18:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Mark Koltko-Rivera for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Koltko-Rivera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Koltko-Rivera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)