User talk:RobertWalden

Welcome!

Hello, RobertWalden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Lectonar 30 June 2005 13:17 (UTC)

Kettlestone

I just came across the Kettlestone article, and it looks like it was copied straight from a copyrighted book,. Please let me know if I'm mistaken. Salsb 01:14, 21 July 2005 (UTC). See Salsb's Talk page for response.[reply]

Norfolk

Some of those ambiguous links to Norfolk should probably have gone to Naval Station Norfolk. —wwoods 06:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that generally this would apply to all articles relating to ships? Rob 13:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I mean all the ship articles relating to the USN that refer to Norfolk unless it is Norfolk UK explicitly? Rob 22:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, not for sure--there's also the seaport city of Norfolk, Virginia. Which is why I linked a lot of those destroyers to Norfolk; I meant to go back and try to be more specific, but I haven't gotten around to it. I wasn't even thinking of the UK Norfolk. But, considering the matter, it's a reasonable presumption--and the city is only one further click away.

—wwoods 22:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:NorfolkColkirk.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:NorfolkColkirk.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 16:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Air Omega UK proposed for deletion

An article that you have been involved in editing, Air Omega UK, has been proposed for deletion. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. cholmes75 17:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vampire/Venom at Museum

Thanks for correcting that, it was a long while ago that I was down there. At the time the poor Vampires plywood was slowly failing (it was also full of spiders) and it wasn't getting any attention. I did help paint the toilet block though. GraemeLeggett 13:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RAF Barnham

I just did a quick google and saw that it was listed as closed in 1960s. However, your local knowledge may be superior so feel free to alter if so. Is it on any current RAF / Royal mail address listings? --mervyn 14:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Tim Birkin.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tim Birkin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kam Solusar (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Newmarket to Wells and Bury Edmunds 1675.jpg

File:Newmarket to Wells and Bury Edmunds 1675.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Britannia Atlas Newmarket to Wells and Bury Edmunds 1675.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Britannia Atlas Newmarket to Wells and Bury Edmunds 1675.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject East Anglia

Would you be interested in WikiProject East Anglia?

If yes, please support us here at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/East Anglia. Wilbysuffolk talk 07:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colkirk - Norfolk dot.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Colkirk - Norfolk dot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NorfolkColkirk.png

The file File:NorfolkColkirk.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]