User talk:RobertOgleFan

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Mykungfu (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Blueboy 96 17:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RobertOgleFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

see below

Decline reason:

Even if you're not confirmed to be a sockpuppet of that particular user, your actions and those of other accounts are enough to prove that you have been abusing multiple accounts to continue your harassment of other users. Your actions are the ones that are taken into consideration here, not those of others. -Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why was I blocked? I was proven not to be a sockpupppet by [1] It states in that checkuser Unrelated and no geographic relationship to MKF's.

I was being harrassed to the left and right by Robotam and Miranda. Who have been forum shopping to get me blocked. I haven't had any major edits in two weeks (though I have edited). [2] [3] [4]

[5]

They open up case after case against me [6]

[7]

[8] [9]

[10]

Miranda has a long history of harrassing other users [11] I saw this [12]

Other admins have stated that they consider my contributions positive [13] . While stating that other people blocked havent edited in a while. [14] and were also proven inconclusive.

In the checkuser according to Thatcher [15] Mykungfu and his suspected socks are in the NYC metro area. I am not in that area. Go thru any IP I have used and you will see that. No one travels at light speed as Robotam and Miranda would have you believe with all the sockpuppets that they claim exist. Again I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. RobertOgleFan (talk) 18:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your excuse and soapboxing are interesting, MKF. So why did a IP from CUNY revert the sockpuppet notice if you are not from the NYC area? miranda 19:10, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RobertOgleFan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is madness! I was blocked as being a sockpuppet of Mykungfu. Someone please clear that up. Hersfold, states that I was abusing multiple accounts, I am stating that I am not. I have not stated one negative thing about Miranda but I am stating that I am being harrassed. Even after being vindicated by checkuser. I have not used another account at all. Where has my behavior ever been said to be uncivil. Look at my contribution history! What actions of mine were taken into consideration. I can't be held responsible for other people who I don't know. Some idiot (Hadsomefun) goes on my page and makes an accusation against Miranda 1 hour after I request for an unblock. Where is Hadsomefun located? File a checkuser with me and Hadsomefun. As he put on my talk page. This along with the other checkuser will I don't use multiple accounts. Can you please look into this, someone? Look at my evidence provided above as well for an overall unblock.

Decline reason:

Per comments and evidence below. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's curious, then, that Hadsomefun was posting on this page [16] [17] [18] [19] with some of the same evidence you were using to defend yourself. Your accounts were created within four days of each other, and somehow noticed you're blocked almost immediately after you do, despite having no reason to be involved in the situation at all. Please also note that checkuser is rarely used to prove your own innocence as you are asking. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 12:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]