User talk:RobertCumming

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Inverse Warburg Effect (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Inverse Warburg Effect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Inverse Warburg Effect has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Inverse Warburg Effect. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inverse Warburg Effect has been accepted

Inverse Warburg Effect, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Inverse Warburg Theory has been accepted

The Inverse Warburg Theory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Inverse Warburg effect

Hi, I'm JamesG5. RobertCumming, thanks for creating Inverse Warburg effect!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Cites are not correctly linked in Wiki format to references. Language is overly technical & impenetrable to a layman, an expert who could put some of it in understandable terms would be useful. This page has no lead section and one should be written. While the page has a number of references, none of them are linked to an online source (Google books, etc) and a search shows multiple online scholarly references available. These should be linked if possible, or added. Page would benefit from sections.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 02:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)